IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v38y2024i11d10.1007_s11269-024-03869-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Likelihood Function and Cutoff Threshold in the GLUE Procedure for Calibration of the Resistance Parameters of Mountain Rivers

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastián Cedillo

    (Universidad de Cuenca
    Universidad de Cuenca)

  • Esteban Sánchez-Cordero

    (Universidad de Cuenca
    Universidad de Cuenca)

  • Paola Duque-Sarango

    (Universidad de Cuenca
    Universidad Politécnica Salesiana)

  • Luis Timbe

    (Universidad de Cuenca
    Universidad de Cuenca)

  • Jaime Veintimilla-Reyes

    (Universidad de Cuenca
    Universidad de Cuenca)

  • Esteban Samaniego

    (Universidad de Cuenca
    Universidad de Cuenca)

  • Andrés Alvarado

    (Universidad de Cuenca
    Universidad de Cuenca)

Abstract

Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) is a widely used methodology for propagating uncertainty through models. However, GLUE has been criticized because of the random selection of two components: i) the likelihood function, which is used to determine the probability that a given set of parameters reflects the observed data, and ii) the cutoff threshold, which is used to divide models into behavioral and nonbehavioral groups. In this research, a GLUE procedure is implemented based on three mountain river morphologies (cascade, step-pool, and plane bed) with different flow characteristics (high, moderate and low flow) located in the Quinuas River basin. Geometry, flow, bed material, and field roughness data are available for the studied reaches. The simple Fuzzy-rule provides different results than metric-based likelihood functions, so a modification of the simple fuzzy-rule is suggested. The metric-based-likelihood functions influence likelihood curve shape and uncertainty values for a certain threshold when the system under study do not meet the model simplifications. The cutoff threshold is proven necessary for reducing uncertainty; however, this value cannot be too stringently set because there are many cases in which observations fall outside the 5% and 95% confidence intervals, producing outliers. A reasonable cutoff threshold seems to be 12%, which is the uncertainty in the water depth estimated with the continuity equation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastián Cedillo & Esteban Sánchez-Cordero & Paola Duque-Sarango & Luis Timbe & Jaime Veintimilla-Reyes & Esteban Samaniego & Andrés Alvarado, 2024. "Analysis of the Likelihood Function and Cutoff Threshold in the GLUE Procedure for Calibration of the Resistance Parameters of Mountain Rivers," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(11), pages 4361-4377, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03869-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-024-03869-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-024-03869-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-024-03869-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03869-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.