IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v37y2023i2d10.1007_s11269-022-03393-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Gradient Descent Optimizers and Dropout Technique on Deep Learning LSTM Performance in Rainfall-runoff Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Duong Tran Anh

    (Van Lang University
    Van Lang University)

  • Dat Vi Thanh

    (Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hai Ba Trung District)

  • Hoang Minh Le

    (York University)

  • Bang Tran Sy

    (University of Nevada)

  • Ahad Hasan Tanim

    (University of South Carolina)

  • Quoc Bao Pham

    (Thu Dau Mot University)

  • Thanh Duc Dang

    (Thuyloi University)

  • Son T. Mai

    (Queen’s University Belfast)

  • Nguyen Mai Dang

    (Thuyloi University)

Abstract

Machine learning and deep learning (ML-DL) based models are widely used for rainfall-runoff prediction and they have potential to substitute process-oriented physics based numerical models. However, developing an ML model has also performance uncertainty because of inaccurate choices of hyperparameters and neural networks architectures. Thus, this study aims to search for best optimization algorithms to be used in ML-DL models namely, RMSprop, Adagrad, Adadelta, and Adam optimizers, as well as dropout techniques to be integrated into the Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) model to improve forecasting accuracy of rainfall-runoff modeling. A deep learning LSTMs were developed using 480 model architectures at two hydro-meteorological stations of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, namely Chau Doc and Can Tho. The model performance is tested with the most ideally suited LSTM optimizers utilizing combinations of four dropout percentages respectively, 0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%. The Adagrad optimizer shows the best model performance in the model testing. Deep learning LSTM models with 10% dropout made the best prediction results while significantly reducing overfitting tendency of the forecasted time series. The findings of this study are valuable for ML-based hydrological models set up by identifying a suitable gradient descent (GD) optimizer and optimal dropout ratio to enhance the performance and forecasting accuracy of the ML model.

Suggested Citation

  • Duong Tran Anh & Dat Vi Thanh & Hoang Minh Le & Bang Tran Sy & Ahad Hasan Tanim & Quoc Bao Pham & Thanh Duc Dang & Son T. Mai & Nguyen Mai Dang, 2023. "Effect of Gradient Descent Optimizers and Dropout Technique on Deep Learning LSTM Performance in Rainfall-runoff Modeling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(2), pages 639-657, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:37:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-022-03393-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-022-03393-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-022-03393-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-022-03393-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amir Molajou & Vahid Nourani & Ali Davanlou Tajbakhsh & Hossein Akbari Variani & Mina Khosravi, 2024. "Multi-Step-Ahead Rainfall-Runoff Modeling: Decision Tree-Based Clustering for Hybrid Wavelet Neural- Networks Modeling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(13), pages 5195-5214, October.
    2. Emine Dilek Taylan, 2024. "An Approach for Future Droughts in Northwest Türkiye: SPI and LSTM Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-22, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:37:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-022-03393-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.