IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v36y2022i14d10.1007_s11269-022-03325-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Spatial Variation and Uncertainty of Rainfall Intensity on Urban Flooding Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Ruozhou Lin

    (Zhejiang University)

  • Feifei Zheng

    (Zhejiang University)

  • Yiyi Ma

    (Zhejiang University)

  • Huan-Feng Duan

    (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

  • Shipeng Chu

    (Zhejiang University)

  • Zhengzhi Deng

    (Zhejiang University)

Abstract

An effective urban drainage system (UDS) is crucial for solving urban flooding problems, motivating plenty of studies to design, build and rehabilitate UDSs. However, the existing design and analysis methods usually assume a uniformly spatial distribution of rainfall intensity throughout an urban catchment, while there is an observably spatial variation of rainfall intensity (SVRI) in most practical systems, especially for short-duration storms and/or large-scale catchments. The assumption ignoring SVRI might fully or partially underestimate the runoffs locally and thus increase the partial flooding risks for the UDS designed under uniformly spatial rainfall distribution. To address this issue, this paper proposes an improved framework with two spatially variable rainfall models (SVRMs) to evaluate the impacts of SVRI on urban flooding. In this proposed framework, four aspects of improvements have been implemented: (i) both SVRMs are derived from the spatially uniform hyetographs to ensure the same total precipitation volume; (ii) both SVRMs utilize the density function of truncated two-dimensional Gaussian distribution to approximate the pattern of SVRI; (iii) different characteristics of SVRI are quantified in these two SVRMs respectively, and (iv) the Monte Carlo method is adopted to implement the uncertainty of rainfall intensity in SVRMs. Besides, two real-world UDSs of different configurations and scales are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed framework. The application results show that the SVRI could significantly aggravate urban flooding risk including flooding duration and volume, and the impact patterns may vary with the characteristics of UDSs. The results and findings of this study also indicate the importance of taking SVRI into consideration in UDS design and flooding assessment practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruozhou Lin & Feifei Zheng & Yiyi Ma & Huan-Feng Duan & Shipeng Chu & Zhengzhi Deng, 2022. "Impact of Spatial Variation and Uncertainty of Rainfall Intensity on Urban Flooding Assessment," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(14), pages 5655-5673, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:36:y:2022:i:14:d:10.1007_s11269-022-03325-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-022-03325-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-022-03325-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-022-03325-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feifei Zheng & Seth Westra & Michael Leonard, 2015. "Opposing local precipitation extremes," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(5), pages 389-390, May.
    2. Carlos Martínez & Arlex Sanchez & Beheshtah Toloh & Zoran Vojinovic, 2018. "Multi-objective Evaluation of Urban Drainage Networks Using a 1D/2D Flood Inundation Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(13), pages 4329-4343, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Omid Seyedashraf & Andrea Bottacin-Busolin & Julien J. Harou, 2021. "Many-Objective Optimization of Sustainable Drainage Systems in Urban Areas with Different Surface Slopes," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(8), pages 2449-2464, June.
    2. Dongwei Qiu & Hao Xu & Dean Luo & Qing Ye & Shaofu Li & Tong Wang & Keliang Ding, 2020. "A rainwater control optimization design approach for airports based on a self-organizing feature map neural network model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Conrad Wasko & Rory Nathan, 2019. "The local dependency of precipitation on historical changes in temperature," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 105-120, September.
    4. Linhan Yang & Jianzhu Li & Aiqing Kang & Shuai Li & Ping Feng, 2020. "The Effect of Nonstationarity in Rainfall on Urban Flooding Based on Coupling SWMM and MIKE21," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(4), pages 1535-1551, March.
    5. Jiun-Huei Jang, 2023. "Optimizing the Cleaning Strategies to Reduce the Flood Risk Increased by Gully Blockages," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(4), pages 1747-1763, March.
    6. Stefan Reinstaller & Fabian Funke & Albert Willhelm König & Markus Pichler & Manfred Kleidorfer & Dirk Muschalla, 2024. "Resilient Urban Flood Management: A Multi-Objective Assessment of Mitigation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:36:y:2022:i:14:d:10.1007_s11269-022-03325-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.