IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v22y2008i10p1409-1420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of AMC-dependent CN-conversion Formulae

Author

Listed:
  • S. Mishra
  • M. Jain
  • P. Suresh Babu
  • K. Venugopal
  • S. Kaliappan

Abstract

The available antecedent moisture condition (AMC)-dependent runoff curve number (CN) (SCS, National Engineering Handbook, Supplement A, Section 4, Chapter 10, Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington, DC, 1956) conversion formulae due to Sobhani (M.S. Thesis, Utah State University, Logan, UT, 1975), Hawkins et al. (J Irrig Drain Eng, ASCE 111:330–340, 1985), Chow et al. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988), and Neitsch et al. (Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, TX, TWRI Report TR-191, 2002) were compared utilizing the NEH-4 CN-values (SCS, National Engineering Handbook, Supplement A, Section 4, Chapter 10, Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington, DC, 1972) as target values. The Sobhani formula was found to perform the best in CN I -conversion, and the Hawkins formula in CN III -conversion. When evaluated on a large set of Agriculture Research Service (United States) data, a newly proposed formula performed the best of all, and the Neitsch formula the poorest, and therefore, the former was recommended for field use. The poorest performance of the latter is largely attributed to the occurrence of unreasonable negative CN I -values at low CN II -values. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Suggested Citation

  • S. Mishra & M. Jain & P. Suresh Babu & K. Venugopal & S. Kaliappan, 2008. "Comparison of AMC-dependent CN-conversion Formulae," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(10), pages 1409-1420, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:22:y:2008:i:10:p:1409-1420
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-007-9233-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11269-007-9233-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-007-9233-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenhai Shi & Mingbin Huang & Kate Gongadze & Lianhai Wu, 2017. "A Modified SCS-CN Method Incorporating Storm Duration and Antecedent Soil Moisture Estimation for Runoff Prediction," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(5), pages 1713-1727, March.
    2. Pingjin Jiao & Di Xu & Shaoli Wang & Yingduo Yu & Songjun Han, 2015. "Improved SCS-CN Method Based on Storage and Depletion of Antecedent Daily Precipitation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(13), pages 4753-4765, October.
    3. Muhammad Ajmal & Jae-Hyun Ahn & Tae-Woong Kim, 2016. "Excess Stormwater Quantification in Ungauged Watersheds Using an Event-Based Modified NRCS Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(4), pages 1433-1448, March.
    4. Muhammad Ajmal & Jae-Hyun Ahn & Tae-Woong Kim, 2016. "Excess Stormwater Quantification in Ungauged Watersheds Using an Event-Based Modified NRCS Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(4), pages 1433-1448, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:22:y:2008:i:10:p:1409-1420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.