IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sumafo/v24y2016i2d10.1007_s00550-016-0409-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opportunities and risks of satisficing levels in efficiency analyses from the perspective of sustainable development
[Chancen und Risiken von Satisfizierungsgrenzen in Effizienzanalysen aus Perspektive nachhaltiger Entwicklung]

Author

Listed:
  • Malte L. Peters

    (Hochschule des Bundes für öffentliche Verwaltung, Fachbereich Finanzen)

  • Stephan Zelewski

    (Universität Duisburg-Essen, Campus Essen)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung In Effizienzanalysen wird regelmäßig unterstellt, dass es wünschenswert ist, ein maximales Verhältnis zwischen produzierten Outputs und eingesetzten Inputs zu realisieren. Gemäß dem Konzept der Satisfizierung können jedoch Handlungen als zufriedenstellend angesehen werden, die einem bestimmten Anspruchsniveau genügen. Dieses Konzept ist in Effizienzanalysetechniken unter anderem durch sogenannte Satisfizierungsgrenzen integriert worden. Im Beitrag werden Chancen und Risiken erörtert, die sich durch die Berücksichtigung von Satisfizierungsgrenzen in Effizienzanalysen aus Perspektive nachhaltiger Entwicklung ergeben.

Suggested Citation

  • Malte L. Peters & Stephan Zelewski, 2016. "Opportunities and risks of satisficing levels in efficiency analyses from the perspective of sustainable development [Chancen und Risiken von Satisfizierungsgrenzen in Effizienzanalysen aus Perspek," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 195-199, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sumafo:v:24:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s00550-016-0409-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00550-016-0409-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00550-016-0409-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00550-016-0409-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    2. Ankit Bansal & Rajesh Kr. Singh & Siddhant Issar & Jayson Varkey, 2014. "Evaluation of vendors ranking by EATWOS approach," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(3), pages 290-311, October.
    3. William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Kaoru Tone, 2006. "Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-0-387-29122-2, October.
    4. Dyckhoff, H. & Allen, K., 2001. "Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 312-325, July.
    5. Scheel, Holger, 2001. "Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 400-410, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Poh, K.L., 2008. "A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Zhou, Peng & Poh, Kim Leng & Ang, Beng Wah, 2007. "A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(1), pages 1-9, April.
    3. Malte L. Peters & Stephan Zelewski, 2021. "Upper and lower satisficing levels in efficiency analysis: a corporate social responsibility perspective," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 187-195, December.
    4. Wu, Jie & An, Qingxian & Xiong, Beibei & Chen, Ya, 2013. "Congestion measurement for regional industries in China: A data envelopment analysis approach with undesirable outputs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 7-13.
    5. Cordero Ferrera, Jose Manuel & Alonso Morán, Edurne & Nuño Solís, Roberto & Orueta, Juan F. & Souto Arce, Regina, 2013. "Efficiency assessment of primary care providers: A conditional nonparametric approach," MPRA Paper 51926, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Karin Eckstein & Jochen Kantelhardt & Helmut Hoffmann, 2008. "Effiziente Erbringung von Umweltleistungen durch landwirtschaftliche Betriebe - Empirische Studie in vier Agrarregionen Bayerns," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 1(1), pages 233-258.
    7. Marlena Gołaś & Piotr Sulewski & Adam Wąs & Anna Kłoczko-Gajewska & Kinga Pogodzińska, 2020. "On the Way to Sustainable Agriculture—Eco-Efficiency of Polish Commercial Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Qingxian An & Xiangyang Tao & Bo Dai & Jinlin Li, 2020. "Modified Distance Friction Minimization Model with Undesirable Output: An Application to the Environmental Efficiency of China’s Regional Industry," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 1047-1071, April.
    9. Ma-Lin Song & Ron Fisher & Jian-Lin Wang & Lian-Biao Cui, 2018. "Environmental performance evaluation with big data: theories and methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 459-472, November.
    10. Halkos, George & Petrou, Kleoniki Natalia, 2019. "Treating undesirable outputs in DEA: A critical review," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 97-104.
    11. Halkos, George & Tzeremes, Nickolaos, 2011. "Does the Kyoto Protocol Agreement matters? An environmental efficiency analysis," MPRA Paper 30652, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. J Sarkis & J J Cordeiro, 2009. "Investigating technical and ecological efficiencies in the electricity generation industry: are there win-win opportunities?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(9), pages 1160-1172, September.
    13. Cook, Wade D. & Seiford, Larry M., 2009. "Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Ma-Lin Song & Yuan-Xiang Zhou & Rong-Rong Zhang & Ron Fisher, 2017. "Environmental efficiency evaluation with left–right fuzzy numbers," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 697-714, October.
    15. Suzuki, Soushi & Nijkamp, Peter, 2016. "An evaluation of energy-environment-economic efficiency for EU, APEC and ASEAN countries: Design of a Target-Oriented DFM model with fixed factors in Data Envelopment Analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 100-112.
    16. E G Gomes & M P E Lins, 2008. "Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(5), pages 616-623, May.
    17. H. K. Millington & J. E. Lovell & C. A. K. Lovell, 2013. "Using Fieldwork, GIS and DEA to Guide Management of Urban Stream Health," CEPA Working Papers Series WP072013, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    18. Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan & Ramanathan, Usha & Bentley, Yongmei, 2018. "The debate on flexibility of environmental regulations, innovation capabilities and financial performance – A novel use of DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 131-138.
    19. Halkos, George & Petrou, Kleoniki Natalia, 2018. "A critical review of the main methods to treat undesirable outputs in DEA," MPRA Paper 90374, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Yigang Wei & Yan Li & Meiyu Wu & Yingbo Li, 2020. "Progressing sustainable development of “the Belt and Road countries”: Estimating environmental efficiency based on the Super‐slack‐based measure model," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 521-539, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sumafo:v:24:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s00550-016-0409-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.