IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v65y2024i3d10.1007_s00362-023-01454-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confidence intervals centred on bootstrap smoothed estimators: an impossibility result

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Kabaila

    (La Trobe University)

  • Christeen Wijethunga

    (La Trobe University)

Abstract

Frequentist confidence intervals that include some element of data-based model selection or model averaging is an active area of research. Assessments of the performance, in terms of coverage and expected length, of such intervals yield few positive results. Efron, JASA 2014, proposed a confidence interval centred on a bootstrap smoothed estimator, with width proportional to an estimator of Efron’s delta method approximation to the standard deviation of this estimator. Recently, Kabaila and Wijethunga assessed the performance of this confidence interval using a testbed consisting of two nested linear regression models, with error variance assumed known. This interval was shown to have far better coverage properties than the corresponding post-model-selection confidence interval. However, its expected length properties were not as good as had been hoped for. For this testbed, we ask the following question. Does there exist a formula for the data-based width of a confidence interval centred on the bootstrap smoothed estimator so that it has good performance in terms of both coverage and expected length? Using a decision-theoretic performance bound we answer this question in the negative.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Kabaila & Christeen Wijethunga, 2024. "Confidence intervals centred on bootstrap smoothed estimators: an impossibility result," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 1531-1551, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:65:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s00362-023-01454-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-023-01454-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-023-01454-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-023-01454-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:65:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s00362-023-01454-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.