IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v54y2013i3p695-708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linear models that allow perfect estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald Christensen
  • Yong Lin

Abstract

The general Gauss–Markov model, Y = Xβ + e, E(e) = 0, Cov(e) = σ 2 V, has been intensively studied and widely used. Most studies consider covariance matrices V that are nonsingular but we focus on the most difficult case wherein C(X), the column space of X, is not contained in C(V). This forces V to be singular. Under this condition there exist nontrivial linear functions of Q′Xβ that are known with probability 1 (perfectly) where $${C(Q)=C(V)^\perp}$$ . To treat $${C(X) \not \subset C(V)}$$ , much of the existing literature obtains estimates and tests by replacing V with a pseudo-covariance matrix T = V + XUX′ for some nonnegative definite U such that $${C(X) \subset C(T)}$$ , see Christensen (Plane answers to complex questions: the theory of linear models, 2002 , Chap. 10). We find it more intuitive to first eliminate what is known about Xβ and then to adjust X while keeping V unchanged. We show that we can decompose β into the sum of two orthogonal parts, β = β 0 + β 1 , where β 0 is known. We also show that the unknown component of X β is $${X\beta_1 \equiv \tilde{X} \gamma}$$ , where $${C(\tilde{X})=C(X)\cap C(V)}$$ . We replace the original model with $${Y-X\beta_0=\tilde{X}\gamma+e}$$ , E(e) = 0, $${Cov(e)=\sigma^2V}$$ and perform estimation and tests under this new model for which the simplifying assumption $${C(\tilde{X}) \subset C(V)}$$ holds. This allows us to focus on the part of that parameters that are not known perfectly. We show that this method provides the usual estimates and tests. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald Christensen & Yong Lin, 2013. "Linear models that allow perfect estimation," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 695-708, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:54:y:2013:i:3:p:695-708
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-012-0455-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00362-012-0455-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-012-0455-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jürgen Groß, 2004. "The general Gauss-Markov model with possibly singular dispersion matrix," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 311-336, July.
    2. Fan J. & Huang L-S., 2001. "Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Parametric Regression Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 640-652, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuqin Sun & Rong Ke & Yongge Tian, 2014. "Some overall properties of seemingly unrelated regression models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 98(2), pages 103-120, April.
    2. Mason David M. & Eubank Randy, 2012. "Moderate deviations and intermediate efficiency for lack-of-fit tests," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 29(2), pages 175-187, June.
    3. Bodhisattva Sen & Mary Meyer, 2017. "Testing against a linear regression model using ideas from shape-restricted estimation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(2), pages 423-448, March.
    4. Gao, Jiti & King, Maxwell, 2003. "Estimation and model specification testing in nonparametric and semiparametric econometric models," MPRA Paper 11989, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Feb 2006.
    5. Guang Jing Song & Qing Wen Wang, 2014. "On the weighted least-squares, the ordinary least-squares and the best linear unbiased estimators under a restricted growth curve model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 375-392, May.
    6. Masamune Iwasawa, 2015. "A Joint Specification Test for Response Probabilities in Unordered Multinomial Choice Models," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-31, September.
    7. Xu Guo & Wangli Xu & Lixing Zhu, 2015. "Model checking for parametric regressions with response missing at random," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 67(2), pages 229-259, April.
    8. Wang-Li Xu & Li-Xing Zhu, 2008. "Goodness-of-fit testing for varying-coefficient models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 129-146, September.
    9. S. Haslett & S. Puntanen & B. Arendacká, 2015. "The link between the mixed and fixed linear models revisited," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 849-861, August.
    10. Pascal Lavergne & Valentin Patilea, 2011. "One for All and All for One: Regression Checks With Many Regressors," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 41-52, January.
    11. Hairu Wang & Zhiping Lu & Yukun Liu, 2023. "Score test for missing at random or not under logistic missingness models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1268-1279, June.
    12. Barrientos, Andrés F. & Canale, Antonio, 2021. "A Bayesian goodness-of-fit test for regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Junmin Liu & Deli Zhu & Luoyao Yu & Xuehu Zhu, 2023. "Specification testing of partially linear single-index models: a groupwise dimension reduction-based adaptive-to-model approach," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(1), pages 232-262, March.
    14. Escanciano, J. Carlos, 2006. "Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Linear and Nonlinear Time Series Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 531-541, June.
    15. E. Deschepper & O. Thas & J. P. Ottoy, 2008. "Tests and Diagnostic Plots for Detecting Lack‐of‐Fit for Circular‐Linear Regression Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 912-920, September.
    16. Escanciano, Juan Carlos & Mayoral, Silvia, 2010. "Data-driven smooth tests for the martingale difference hypothesis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 1983-1998, August.
    17. Otsu, Taisuke & Taylor, Luke, 2021. "Specification Testing For Errors-In-Variables Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(4), pages 747-768, August.
    18. Zhang, Jun & Li, Gaorong & Feng, Zhenghui, 2015. "Checking the adequacy for a distortion errors-in-variables parametric regression model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 52-64.
    19. Emmanuel Guerre & Pascal Lavergne, 2004. "Data-Driven Rate-Optimal Specification Testing In Regression Models," Econometrics 0411008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Akdeniz Duran, Esra & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Osipenko, Maria, 2012. "Difference based ridge and Liu type estimators in semiparametric regression models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 164-175.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:54:y:2013:i:3:p:695-708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.