Estimation of a sensitive proportion by Warner’s randomized response data through inverse sampling
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1007/s00362-009-0234-8
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Arijit Chaudhuri & Sanghamitra Pal, 2008. "Estimating sensitive proportions from Warner’s randomized responses in alternative ways restricting to only distinct units sampled," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 147-156, September.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Sabrina Giordano & Pier Perri, 2012. "Efficiency comparison of unrelated question models based on same privacy protection degree," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 987-999, November.
- Kajal Dihidar & Manjima Bhattacharya, 2017. "Estimating Sensitive Population Proportion Using A Combination Of Binomial And Hypergeometric Randomized Responses By Direct And Inverse Mechanism," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 18(2), pages 193-210, June.
- Dihidar Kajal & Bhattacharya Manjima, 2017. "Estimating Sensitive Population Proportion Using a Combination of Binomial and Hypergeometric Randomized Responses by Direct and Inverse Mechanism," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 18(2), pages 193-210, June.
- Heiko Groenitz, 2015. "Using prior information in privacy-protecting survey designs for categorical sensitive variables," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 167-189, February.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Horng-Jinh Chang & Mei-Pei Kuo, 2012. "Estimation of population proportion in randomized response sampling using weighted confidence interval construction," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 75(5), pages 655-672, July.
More about this item
Keywords
Inverse sampling; Repeated randomized response; Unbiased estimation; With replacement sampling; 62 D05;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:52:y:2011:i:2:p:343-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.