IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stmapp/v33y2024i2d10.1007_s10260-023-00732-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multinomial Thompson sampling for rating scales and prior considerations for calibrating uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Deliu

    (Sapienza Università di Roma
    University of Cambridge)

Abstract

Bandit algorithms such as Thompson sampling (TS) have been put forth for decades as useful tools for conducting adaptively-randomised experiments. By skewing the allocation toward superior arms, they can substantially improve particular outcomes of interest for both participants and investigators. For example, they may use participants’ ratings for continuously optimising their experience with a program. However, most of the bandit and TS variants are based on either binary or continuous outcome models, leading to suboptimal performances in rating scale data. Guided by behavioural experiments we conducted online, we address this problem by introducing Multinomial-TS for rating scales. After assessing its improved empirical performance in unique optimal arm scenarios, we explore potential considerations (including prior’s role) for calibrating uncertainty and balancing arm allocation in scenarios with no unique optimal arms.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Deliu, 2024. "Multinomial Thompson sampling for rating scales and prior considerations for calibrating uncertainty," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 33(2), pages 439-469, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:33:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10260-023-00732-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10260-023-00732-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10260-023-00732-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10260-023-00732-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:33:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10260-023-00732-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.