IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stmapp/v10y2001i1d10.1007_bf02511636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strong previsions of random elements

Author

Listed:
  • Patrizia Berti

    (Università di Modena)

  • Eugenio Regazzini

    (Università di Pavia)

  • Pietro Rigo

    (Università di Pavia)

Abstract

LetC be a class of arbitrary real random elements andP an extended real valued function onC. Two definitions of coherence forP are compared. Both definitions reduce to the classical de Finetti's one whenC includes bounded random elements only. One of the two definitions (called strong coherence) is investigated, and some criteria for checking it are provided. Moreover, conditions are given for the integral representation of a coherentP, possibly with respect to a δ-additive probability. Finally, the two definitions and the integral representation theorems are extended to the case whereC is a class of random elements taking values in a given Banach space.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrizia Berti & Eugenio Regazzini & Pietro Rigo, 2001. "Strong previsions of random elements," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 10(1), pages 11-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:10:y:2001:i:1:d:10.1007_bf02511636
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02511636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF02511636
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02511636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clark, Stephen A., 1993. "The valuation problem in arbitrage price theory," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 463-478.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark Schervish & Teddy Seidenfeld & Joseph Kadane, 2014. "On the equivalence of conglomerability and disintegrability for unbounded random variables," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 23(4), pages 501-518, November.
    2. Pierpaolo Angelini, 2024. "Invariance of the Mathematical Expectation of a Random Quantity and Its Consequences," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Pierpaolo Angelini, 2020. "A Portfolio of Risky Assets and Its Intrinsic Properties," Journal of Mathematics Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 1-61, June.
    4. Pierpaolo Angelini & Fabrizio Maturo, 2020. "Non-Parametric Probability Distributions Embedded Inside of a Linear Space Provided with a Quadratic Metric," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Mark J. Schervish & Teddy Seidenfeld & Joseph B. Kadane, 2014. "On the equivalence of conglomerability and disintegrability for unbounded random variables," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 23(4), pages 501-518, November.
    6. Patrizia Berti & Luca Pratelli & Pietro Rigo, 2013. "Finitely Additive Equivalent Martingale Measures," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 46-57, March.
    7. Pierpaolo Angelini, 2024. "Extended Least Squares Making Evident Nonlinear Relationships between Variables: Portfolios of Financial Assets," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Patrizia Berti & Luca Pratelli & Pietro Rigo, 2010. "Finitely Additive Equivalent Martingale Measures," Quaderni di Dipartimento 123, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods.
    9. Vantaggi, Barbara, 2010. "Incomplete preferences on conditional random quantities: Representability by conditional previsions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 104-112, September.
    10. Pierpaolo Angelini & Fabrizio Maturo, 2022. "The consumer’s demand functions defined to study contingent consumption plans," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1159-1175, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergey Badikov & Mark H. A. Davis & Antoine Jacquier, 2018. "Perturbation analysis of sub/super hedging problems," Papers 1806.03543, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    2. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    3. Chambers, Robert G. & Quiggin, John C., 2002. "Resource Allocation And Asset Pricing," Working Papers 28594, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    4. Chambers, Robert G. & Quiggin, John, 2009. "Separability of stochastic production decisions from producer risk preferences in the presence of financial markets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(11), pages 730-737, December.
    5. Salvador Cruz Rambaud, 2019. "Algebraic Properties of Arbitrage: An Application to Additivity of Discount Functions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Beißner, Patrick, 2013. "Coherent Price Systems and Uncertainty-Neutral Valuation," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 80010, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    7. Jouini, Elyes & Kallal, Hedi & Napp, Clotilde, 2001. "Arbitrage and viability in securities markets with fixed trading costs," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 197-221, April.
    8. Maria Arduca & Cosimo Munari, 2020. "Fundamental theorem of asset pricing with acceptable risk in markets with frictions," Papers 2012.08351, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    9. Marco Scarsini & Yossi Feinberg, 2003. "Rate of Arbitrage and Reconciled Beliefs," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(11), pages 1-12.
    10. Stephen A. Clark, 2003. "An Infinite-Dimensional LP Duality Theorem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 233-245, May.
    11. Robert Chambers & John Quiggin, 2010. "Cost minimization and the stochastic discount factor," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 349-368, April.
    12. Chambers, Robert G. & Quiggin, John, 2008. "Narrowing the no-arbitrage bounds," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Elyès Jouini, 2003. "Market imperfections , equilibrium and arbitrage," Post-Print halshs-00167131, HAL.
    14. Aloisio Araujo & Alain Chateauneuf & José Faro, 2012. "Pricing rules and Arrow–Debreu ambiguous valuation," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 49(1), pages 1-35, January.
    15. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5593 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Li Chen & H. Vincent Poor, 2003. "Credit Risk Modeling and the Term Structure of Credit Spreads," Finance 0312009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Sergey Badikov & Mark H.A. Davis & Antoine Jacquier, 2021. "Perturbation analysis of sub/super hedging problems," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1240-1274, October.
    18. Leitner Johannes, 2005. "Optimal portfolios with expected loss constraints and shortfall risk optimal martingale measures," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 23(1/2005), pages 49-66, January.
    19. Patrick Bei{ss}ner, 2012. "Coherent Price Systems and Uncertainty-Neutral Valuation," Papers 1202.6632, arXiv.org.
    20. Jaime A. Londo~no, 2003. "State Tameness: A New Approach for Credit Constrains," Papers math/0305274, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2004.
    21. Walter Farkas & Pablo Koch-Medina & Cosimo Munari, 2013. "Measuring risk with multiple eligible assets," Papers 1308.3331, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2014.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:10:y:2001:i:1:d:10.1007_bf02511636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.