IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stabio/v16y2024i1d10.1007_s12561-023-09386-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the Power to Detect Indirect Effects in Mediation Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • John Kidd

    (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

  • Dan-Yu Lin

    (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

Abstract

Causal mediation analysis seeks to determine whether an independent variable affects a response variable directly or whether it does so indirectly, by way of a mediator. The existing statistical tests to determine the existence of an indirect effect are overly conservative or have inflated type I error. In this article, we consider the principle of intersection–union tests and a method called the S-test. This method increases power but is not appropriate for statistical tests as small significance levels may cause the test to reject a null hypothesis, but larger significance levels will not reject the same hypothesis. We propose two new methods that provide increased power over existing methods while controlling type I error. We demonstrate through extensive simulation that the S-test and proposed methods control type I error and increase power over existing methods, and that while the proposed methods do not have the same problems, they provide similar power to the S-test. Finally, we provide an application to a large proteomic study.

Suggested Citation

  • John Kidd & Dan-Yu Lin, 2024. "Improving the Power to Detect Indirect Effects in Mediation Analysis," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 16(1), pages 129-141, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:16:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s12561-023-09386-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s12561-023-09386-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12561-023-09386-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12561-023-09386-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:16:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s12561-023-09386-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.