IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stabio/v14y2022i2d10.1007_s12561-022-09337-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building an External Control Arm for Development of a New Molecular Entity: An Application in a Recurrent Glioblastoma Trial for MDNA55

Author

Listed:
  • Antara Majumdar

    (Acorn AI by Medidata, A Dassault Systemes Company)

  • Ruthanna Davi

    (Acorn AI by Medidata, A Dassault Systemes Company)

  • Martin Bexon

    (Medicenna Therapeutics Corp.)

  • Chandtip Chandhasin

    (Medicenna Therapeutics Corp.)

  • Melissa Coello

    (Medicenna Therapeutics Corp.)

  • Fahar Merchant

    (Medicenna Therapeutics Corp.)

  • Nina Merchant

    (Medicenna Therapeutics Corp.)

Abstract

In certain indications, it is well understood that randomized controlled trials lead to slow enrollment and high differential drop-out rate in the standard of care control arm when the standard of care is undesirable to patients. This not only impacts the pace of drug development but may also render a randomized trial uninterpretable if drop-out from the control arm is common. Single-arm trials are common in such indications. An external control arm (ECA) built using a propensity score method (Rosenbaum and Rubin, Biometrika 70:41–55, 1983) from subjects outside the current trial but who meet the same eligibility criteria as the subjects of the current trial, is valuable in assessing treatment effect of a new drug that cannot be otherwise assessed with a single-arm trial, or an unintentionally under-powered and arguably biased randomized controlled trial. Propensity score methods have increasingly gained importance in observational medical research, paving the way for the use of these methods in non-randomized clinical trials. In this paper, we describe our experience with building an ECA for drug development related to regulatory activities associated with a new molecular entity (NME). Through analysis of a phase 2 study, we show how best practices from causal statistical methods can be used to build an ECA for a non-randomized drug trial—a novel application of a well-studied method. To prevent selection bias, the selection of subjects for the ECA was carried out by an independent group of statisticians who were blinded to all patient outcome data. We share lessons learnt from our regulatory interactions that provide helpful suggestions on how to advance ECA-based drug development. There has been interest in confirmatory trials that use reduced control arm randomization along with an ECA. We present a design for such a hybrid trial using a propensity score weighting method and describe how a standard propensity score analysis can be used to analyze data resulting from a composite hybrid randomized and external control arm.

Suggested Citation

  • Antara Majumdar & Ruthanna Davi & Martin Bexon & Chandtip Chandhasin & Melissa Coello & Fahar Merchant & Nina Merchant, 2022. "Building an External Control Arm for Development of a New Molecular Entity: An Application in a Recurrent Glioblastoma Trial for MDNA55," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 14(2), pages 285-303, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:14:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s12561-022-09337-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s12561-022-09337-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12561-022-09337-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12561-022-09337-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:14:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s12561-022-09337-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.