IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v173y2024i3d10.1007_s11205-024-03372-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Rating Scales and Question Attributes on the Validity and Reliability of Generalized Trust Scales

Author

Listed:
  • Blaine G. Robbins

    (New York University Abu Dhabi)

Abstract

Trust is important for a range of societal outcomes. Despite its significance, there is considerable debate about how best to measure trust. In the context of a newly developed measure of generalized trust—the Stranger Face Trust scale (SFT)—this study evaluates whether different features of survey scales affect the reliability and validity of SFT, which relies on the standard 4-point unipolar scale used by many survey institutes. In a survey experiment conducted with a non-probability sample of U.S. adults (N = 4252), we randomly assigned intensity scale midpoints, polarity, and “don’t know” options to SFT. Results indicate that 7- and 9-point bipolar scales without a “don’t know” option slightly outperform all other scales on some psychometric tests, particularly those related to formal properties of the scales and factorial validity, but not on psychometric tests assessing survey environment or convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity.

Suggested Citation

  • Blaine G. Robbins, 2024. "The Influence of Rating Scales and Question Attributes on the Validity and Reliability of Generalized Trust Scales," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 915-940, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:173:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11205-024-03372-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-024-03372-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-024-03372-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-024-03372-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:173:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11205-024-03372-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.