IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snopef/v6y2025i2d10.1007_s43069-025-00435-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the Barriers of Industry 4.0 Adoption in Indian Healthcare Sector Using Best–Worst Method

Author

Listed:
  • Rekha Goyat

    (Lovely Professional University)

  • Mahipal Singh

    (Lovely Professional University)

Abstract

The present article aims to explore the critical barriers of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) implementation in healthcare industries in the context of a developing economy like India. I4.0 has gained substantial attention from both researchers and professionals due to its manifold advantages for manufacturing enterprises. The literature has extensively explored various facets of I4.0 within the healthcare sector as well. Nevertheless, there has been relatively less emphasis on investigating the barriers associated with the adoption of I4.0 in healthcare. To fulfil this research gap, the present study has been conducted in the context of the Indian healthcare sector. The barriers of I4.0 related to the healthcare sector were identified through a literature review and examined further via a novel multi-criteria decision-making approach, i.e., Best–Worst Method (BWM). The outcome of the BWM approach revealed that the most critical barrier potentially impeding the adoption of I4.0 in the Indian healthcare sector is the “poor technological infrastructure,” while “Data transformation and acquisition” are comparatively less significant among the finalized barriers. These findings can serve as valuable insights for decision-makers, healthcare managers, and practitioners to realize the specific challenges of I4.0 adoption in the Indian healthcare industry. Moreover, it would assist them in controlling the barriers which leads to making policies and approaches for the successful adoption of I4.0 technology in healthcare industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Rekha Goyat & Mahipal Singh, 2025. "Analyzing the Barriers of Industry 4.0 Adoption in Indian Healthcare Sector Using Best–Worst Method," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:6:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s43069-025-00435-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s43069-025-00435-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43069-025-00435-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43069-025-00435-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:6:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s43069-025-00435-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.