Author
Listed:
- Alexander Schiewe
(Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial and Applied Mathematics)
- Anita Schöbel
(Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau)
- Linda Sieber
(RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau)
Abstract
Line planning as one of the first planning stages in public transport is a well-researched topic. Nearly all models start with the assumption that the demand for public transport is known and fixed. For real-world applications this assumption is not practicable, since there are different demands depending on the period of the day and the day of the week, e.g., the high demand in morning traffic differs from the demand during a week-day, or from the low demand on Sunday’s afternoons, or at night. Planning lines for different demand periods comes with two conflicting goals: On the one hand, the line concept should be adapted as good as possible to the respective demand. On the other hand, the lines should be as similar as possible for different demand periods, e.g., the line plan for Sunday afternoon should be related to the one on Monday morning. In this paper, we show that line planning for different demand periods can be modeled and solved: We introduce the multi-period line planning problem which is to find optimized line concepts for each demand period which are similar (enough) to each other. To this end, we discuss three different approaches to define the (dis)similarity between line concepts. These are frequency-based concepts, and concepts taking the number of different lines and the shape of the lines into account. For the latter, we use Wasserstein distances for modeling the similarity between two line concepts. We show that for all these similarity measures the line planning problem can be formulated as an integer linear program and solved efficiently. Our experiments furthermore show the differences of the resulting line concepts, and that the similarity of line concepts between different demand periods and the quality of the line concept are conflicting goals.
Suggested Citation
Alexander Schiewe & Anita Schöbel & Linda Sieber, 2023.
"Line Planning for Different Demand Periods,"
SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 1-28, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:snopef:v:4:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-023-00268-7
DOI: 10.1007/s43069-023-00268-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:4:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-023-00268-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.