IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v55y2003i6d10.1007_bf03372715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zur Vorteilhaftigkeit von Kapitallebensversicherungen gegenüber alternativen Anlageformen — Eine Analyse aus Anlegersicht

Author

Listed:
  • Helmut Gründl

    (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin)

  • Richard Stehle

    (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin)

  • Thorsten Waldow

    (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin)

Abstract

Summary In Germany the most important life insurance product is the endowment policy. The insurance buyer makes regular (annual or monthly) premium payments and receives a payment when he dies, cancels within the contract period, or survives the contract. Contracts typically cover a time period between twelve to forty years. Using the perspective of an investor, i.e., a buyer of the life insurance contract, our study compares the cash flows of German endowment insurance policies with those of investment portfolios with similar pay-off structures. Our empirical analysis is based on data from 12 year contract periods between the years 1956 through 1999 for 51 year old males. Instead of basing the comparison of the life insurance and the alternative portfolio on a single performance figure, for example, yield-to-maturity or terminal value, we look directly at the cash flows. Our analysis shows that life insurance contracts provided higher payments than the alternative portfolios if the actual contract length was at least seven or eight years and if tax effects were taken into account. The study also shows that life insurance contracts underperform the alternative portfolios considerably if they are cancelled during their early years. Therefore, an ultimate evaluation has to be based on the characteristics of the individual who considers such an investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Helmut Gründl & Richard Stehle & Thorsten Waldow, 2003. "Zur Vorteilhaftigkeit von Kapitallebensversicherungen gegenüber alternativen Anlageformen — Eine Analyse aus Anlegersicht," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 549-577, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:55:y:2003:i:6:d:10.1007_bf03372715
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03372715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03372715
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03372715?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Jaschke & Richard Stehle & Stephan Wernicke, 2000. "Arbitrage und die Gültigkeit des Barwertprinzips im Markt für Bundeswertpapiere," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 440-468, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      G11; G22;

      JEL classification:

      • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
      • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:55:y:2003:i:6:d:10.1007_bf03372715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.