IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v50y1998i10d10.1007_bf03371540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bernoulli-Prinzip und Risikoeinstellung

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Bitz

    (FernUniversität Hagen)

Abstract

Summary One important and generally accepted result of the long-lasting discussion in german literature is the compatibility of Expected Utility Theory (EUT) with different types of risk preference. Recently, however, there was presented the argument, that EUT is only compatible with risk neutrality. This paper shows the main inconsistencies of this argument, especially the incorrect interpretation of the formal structure of EUT.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Bitz, 1998. "Bernoulli-Prinzip und Risikoeinstellung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 50(10), pages 916-932, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:50:y:1998:i:10:d:10.1007_bf03371540
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03371540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03371540
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03371540?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pfohl, Hans-Christian & Braun, G., 1981. "Entscheidungstheorie. Normative und deskriptive Grundlagen des Entscheidens," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 41746, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mike Rudolph & Anika Suess & Florian Lindner & Kristina Hoese & Josephin Haenel & Fanny Richter & Uwe Goetze, 2021. "Identifikation, Analyse und Systematisierung von Anforderungen an betriebswirtschaftliche Entscheidungsmodelle - Entwicklung einer Anforderungshierarchie," Chemnitz Economic Papers 049, Department of Economics, Chemnitz University of Technology, revised Sep 2021.
    2. Hellberg-Bahr, Anneke & Steffen, Nina & Spiller, Achim, 2011. "Unternehmensstrategische Defizite in Genossenschaftsmolkereien: Eine mitgliederbasierte Fallstudie," 51st Annual Conference, Halle, Germany, September 28-30, 2011 114496, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    3. Cornelia Zanger & Radka Hodicová & Hansjoerg Gaus, 2008. "Psychic distance and cross – border cooperation of SMEs: An empirical study on Saxon and Czech entrepreneurs’ interest in cooperation," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 13(1), pages 40-62.
    4. Hellberg-Bahr, A. & Steffen, N. & Spiller, A., 2012. "Unternehmensstrategie Defizite in Genossenschaftsmolkereien: Eine mitgliederbasierte Fallstudie," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 47, March.
    5. Karola Bastini & Rainer Kasperzak, 2013. "Erkenntnisfortschritt in der Rechnungslegung durch experimentelle Forschung? — Diskussion methodischer Grundsatzfragen anhand der Entscheidungsnützlichkeit des Performance Reporting," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 65(7), pages 622-660, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:50:y:1998:i:10:d:10.1007_bf03371540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.