IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v98y2014i2d10.1007_s11192-013-1171-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An overview of forestry journals in the period 2006–2010 as basis for ascertaining research trends

Author

Listed:
  • Srđan Bojović

    (University of Belgrade)

  • Rada Matić

    (University of Belgrade)

  • Zorica Popović

    (University of Belgrade)

  • Miroslava Smiljanić

    (University of Belgrade)

  • Milena Stefanović

    (University of Belgrade)

  • Vera Vidaković

    (University of Belgrade)

Abstract

Articles published between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2010 in 42 forestry journals (N = 16,258) were collected and, depending on their content and key words, classified in one of 22 sub-disciplines. Among the forestry sub-disciplines, the following are currently dominant: Mensuration and inventories, Forest management, Plant ecophysiology and Wood science. PCA ordination was used to visualize grouping tendencies and data separation. For each component, a number of characteristics contributed to the total variation, and significant importance was attached to those with the highest loading factors. The first component included Mensuration and inventories, Plant ecophysiology, Vegetation ecology and Forest management, as the highest loading factors. The second components comprised Sociological aspects, Plant ecophysiology, Wood science and Forest management. The most pronounced increase trend over the five-year period is noted for Genetics and breeding, Vegetation ecology, Fuels and energy, while the most pronounced decrease trend is visible in Forest health, Forest fire, Sociological aspects and Forest products. PCA suggests the existence of three groups of journals: the first group comprises Forest Ecology and Management and Canadian Journal of Forest Research, the dominating two, the second group comprises Annals of Forest Science, Plant Ecology, Tree Physiology and Trees-Structure and Function, while the rest of the journals belong to the third group. The Canadian Journal of Forest Research is the most diversified, while Tree Genetics and Genomes, Silvae Genetica and Tree-ring Research are narrowly specialized.

Suggested Citation

  • Srđan Bojović & Rada Matić & Zorica Popović & Miroslava Smiljanić & Milena Stefanović & Vera Vidaković, 2014. "An overview of forestry journals in the period 2006–2010 as basis for ascertaining research trends," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1331-1346, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:98:y:2014:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1171-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1171-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-013-1171-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-013-1171-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuen-Hsien Tseng & Ming-Yueh Tsay, 2013. "Journal clustering of library and information science for subfield delineation using the bibliometric analysis toolkit: CATAR," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(2), pages 503-528, May.
    2. Xianwen Wang & Zhi Wang & Shenmeng Xu, 2013. "Tracing scientist’s research trends realtimely," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(2), pages 717-729, May.
    3. Robert Deacon & Charles Kolstad & Allen Kneese & David Brookshire & David Scrogin & Anthony Fisher & Michael Ward & Kerry Smith & James Wilen, 1998. "Research Trends and Opportunities in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(3), pages 383-397, April.
    4. Zhong-Yi Wang & Gang Li & Chun-Ya Li & Ang Li, 2012. "Research on the semantic-based co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(3), pages 855-875, March.
    5. Sadath, Md. Nazmus & Krott, Max, 2012. "Identifying policy change — Analytical program analysis: An example of two decades of forest policy in Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 93-99.
    6. Vanclay, Jerome K., 2008. "Ranking forestry journals using the h-index," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 326-334.
    7. Yuen-Hsien Tseng & Yu-I Lin & Yi-Yang Lee & Wen-Chi Hung & Chun-Hsiang Lee, 2009. "A comparison of methods for detecting hot topics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(1), pages 73-90, October.
    8. Fabrizio Natale & Gianluca Fiore & Johann Hofherr, 2012. "Mapping the research on aquaculture. A bibliometric analysis of aquaculture literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(3), pages 983-999, March.
    9. Gangfeng Zhang & Shaodong Xie & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2010. "A bibliometric analysis of world volatile organic compounds research trends," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(2), pages 477-492, May.
    10. Mark William Neff & Elizabeth A. Corley, 2009. "35 years and 160,000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(3), pages 657-682, September.
    11. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Tindaro Cicero, 2012. "What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 1005-1017, December.
    12. Shaodong Xie & Jing Zhang & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2008. "Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 77(1), pages 113-130, October.
    13. Thomas W. Steele & Jeffrey C. Stier, 2000. "The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences: a forestry case study," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 51(5), pages 476-484.
    14. Arden White & Nelda Rae Hernandez, 1991. "Increasing field complexity revealed through article title analyses," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 42(10), pages 731-734, December.
    15. Kun-Yang Chuang & Ya-Li Huang & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2007. "A bibliometric and citation analysis of stroke-related research in Taiwan," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 72(2), pages 201-212, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Baolong & Wang, Hao & Deng, Sanhong & Su, Xinning, 2020. "Measurement and analysis of Chinese journal discriminative capacity," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1).
    2. Fernando Zambrano Farias & María del Carmen Valls Martínez & Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes, 2021. "Explanatory Factors of Business Failure: Literature Review and Global Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-26, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang Tan & Hui-Zhen Fu & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2014. "A bibliometric analysis of research on proteomics in Science Citation Index Expanded," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1473-1490, February.
    2. Yuh-Shan Ho, 2016. "Rebuttal to: Liu et al. “Progress in global parallel computing research: a bibliometric approach”, vol. 95, pp 967–983," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1693-1694, September.
    3. Xuefeng Wang & Shuo Zhang & Yuqin liu, 2022. "ITGInsight–discovering and visualizing research fronts in the scientific literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6509-6531, November.
    4. Yaoyang, Xu & Boeing, Wiebke J., 2013. "Mapping biofuel field: A bibliometric evaluation of research output," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 82-91.
    5. Ivan Jarić & Jelena Knežević-Jarić & Mirjana Lenhardt, 2014. "Relative age of references as a tool to identify emerging research fields with an application to the field of ecology and environmental sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 100(2), pages 519-529, August.
    6. Chen, Guo & Xiao, Lu, 2016. "Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 212-223.
    7. Rongzhen Ma & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2016. "Comparison of environmental laws publications in Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Science Index: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 227-239, October.
    8. Du, Huibin & Li, Na & Brown, Marilyn A. & Peng, Yuenuan & Shuai, Yong, 2014. "A bibliographic analysis of recent solar energy literatures: The expansion and evolution of a research field," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 696-706.
    9. Yun Qi & Xingyu Chen & Zhan Hu & Chunfeng Song & Yuanlu Cui, 2019. "Bibliometric Analysis of Algal-Bacterial Symbiosis in Wastewater Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Cai, Mengfan & An, Chunjiang & Guy, Christophe, 2021. "A scientometric analysis and review of biogenic volatile organic compound emissions: Research hotspots, new frontiers, and environmental implications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    11. Zhichao Fang & Rodrigo Costas & Wencan Tian & Xianwen Wang & Paul Wouters, 2020. "An extensive analysis of the presence of altmetric data for Web of Science publications across subject fields and research topics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 2519-2549, September.
    12. Mohsen Fazeli-Varzaneh & Pete Bettinger & Erfan Ghaderi-Azad & Marcin Kozak & Davood Mafi-Gholami & Abolfazl Jaafari, 2021. "Forestry Research in the Middle East: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Hui-Zhen Fu & Xiao Long & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2014. "China’s research in chemical engineering journals in Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(1), pages 119-136, January.
    14. Hang Wen & Yi Huang, 2012. "Trends and performance of oxidative stress research from 1991 to 2010," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(1), pages 51-63, April.
    15. Jingqiu Liao & Yi Huang, 2014. "Global trend in aquatic ecosystem research from 1992 to 2011," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1203-1219, February.
    16. Dragan Ivanović & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2014. "Independent publications from Serbia in the Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 603-622, October.
    17. Liao, Huchang & Tang, Ming & Li, Zongmin & Lev, Benjamin, 2019. "Bibliometric analysis for highly cited papers in operations research and management science from 2008 to 2017 based on Essential Science Indicators," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 223-236.
    18. Yingjin Song & Ruiyi Li & Guanyi Chen & Beibei Yan & Lei Zhong & Yuxin Wang & Yihang Li & Jinlei Li & Yingxiu Zhang, 2021. "Bibliometric Analysis of Current Status on Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils during 2000–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Abramo, Giovanni & D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea & Di Costa, Flavia, 2019. "Diversification versus specialization in scientific research: Which strategy pays off?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 82, pages 51-57.
    20. Maribel Vega-Arce & Gonzalo Salas & Gastón Núñez-Ulloa & Cristián Pinto-Cortez & Ivelisse Torres Fernandez & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2019. "Research performance and trends in child sexual abuse research: a Science Citation Index Expanded-based analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1505-1525, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:98:y:2014:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1171-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.