IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v96y2013i1d10.1007_s11192-012-0918-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global remote sensing research trends during 1991–2010: a bibliometric analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yanhua Zhuang

    (Wuhan University)

  • Xingjian Liu

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Thuminh Nguyen

    (Wuhan University)

  • Qingqing He

    (Wuhan University)

  • Song Hong

    (Wuhan University)

Abstract

According to the articles related to remote sensing of SCI and SSCI databases during 1991–2010, this study evaluated the geographical influence of authors by the new index (geographical impact factor), and revealed the auctorial, institutional, national, and spatiotemporal patterns in remote sensing research. Remote sensing research went up significantly in the past two decades. Imaging science & photographic technology was the important subject category. International Journal of Remote Sensing was the top active journal. All authors were mainly concentrated in North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. Jackson TJ from USDA ARS was the most productive author, Coops NC from University of British Columbia had more high-quality articles, and Running SW from University of Montana carried the greatest geographical influence. The USA was the largest contributor in global remote sensing research with the most single-country and internationally collaborative articles, and the NASA was the most powerful research institute. The international cooperation of remote sensing research increased distinctly. Co-word analysis found the common remote sensing platform and sensors, revealed the widespread adoption of major technologies, and demonstrated keen interest in land cover/land use, vegetation, and climate change. Moreover, the remote sensing research was closely correlated with the satellite development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanhua Zhuang & Xingjian Liu & Thuminh Nguyen & Qingqing He & Song Hong, 2013. "Global remote sensing research trends during 1991–2010: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 96(1), pages 203-219, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:96:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0918-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0918-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-012-0918-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-012-0918-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gangan Prathap, 2010. "The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(1), pages 167-172, July.
    2. Ying Yang & Mingzhi Wu & Lei Cui, 2012. "Integration of three visualization methods based on co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(2), pages 659-673, February.
    3. Wen-Ta Chiu & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2007. "Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 73(1), pages 3-17, October.
    4. Per O. Seglen & Dag W. Aksnes, 2000. "Scientific Productivity and Group Size: A Bibliometric Analysis of Norwegian Microbiological Research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 49(1), pages 125-143, August.
    5. Limei Zhao & Qingpu Zhang, 2011. "Mapping knowledge domains of Chinese digital library research output, 1994–2010," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 89(1), pages 51-87, October.
    6. Xingjian Liu & F. Benjamin Zhan & Song Hong & Beibei Niu & Yaolin Liu, 2012. "A bibliometric study of earthquake research: 1900–2010," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(3), pages 747-765, September.
    7. Anton J. Nederhof, 2006. "Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 66(1), pages 81-100, January.
    8. Jun-Ying Fu & Xu Zhang & Yun-Hua Zhao & Dar-Zen Chen & Mu-Hsuan Huang, 2012. "Global performance of traditional Chinese medicine over three decades," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(3), pages 945-958, March.
    9. Anthony F. J. Raan, 2006. "Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 67(3), pages 491-502, June.
    10. Ulrich Schmoch & Torben Schubert, 2008. "Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 74(3), pages 361-377, March.
    11. Wolfgang Glänzel, 2000. "Science in Scandinavia: A Bibliometric Approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 49(2), pages 357-357, October.
    12. Wolfgang Glänzel, 2000. "Science in Scandinavia: A Bibliometric Approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 48(2), pages 121-150, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang Zhang & Sisi Li & Hugo A. Loáiciga & Yanhua Zhuang & Yun Du, 2015. "Opportunities and challenges of interbasin water transfers: a literature review with bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 279-294, October.
    2. Ping Lei & Ram Kumar Shrestha & Bing Zhu & Suju Han & Hongbin Yang & Shaojun Tan & Jiupai Ni & Deti Xie, 2021. "A Bibliometric Analysis on Nonpoint Source Pollution: Current Status, Development, and Future," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Giovanni Matteo & Pierfrancesco Nardi & Stefano Grego & Caterina Guidi, 2018. "Bibliometric analysis of Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment research," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 508-516, December.
    4. Ole Ellegaard & Johan A. Wallin, 2015. "The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1809-1831, December.
    5. Berenice Alfaro-Ponce & Rosa Durán-González & Luisa Morales-Maure & Jorge Sanabria-Z, 2024. "Citizen science as a relevant approach to the challenges of complex thinking development in higher education: mapping and bibliometric analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Temitope Love Baiyegunhi & Christopher Baiyegunhi & Benedict Kinshasa Pharoe, 2022. "Global Research Trends on Shale Gas from 2010–2020 Using a Bibliometric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Qing Cheng & Xin Lu & Zhong Liu & Jincai Huang, 2015. "Mining research trends with anomaly detection models: the case of social computing research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 453-469, May.
    8. Qing Ji & Xiaoping Pang & Xi Zhao, 2014. "A bibliometric analysis of research on Antarctica during 1993–2012," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 1925-1939, December.
    9. Sheriza Mohd Razali & Maizatul Azwa Radzi & Arnaldo Marin & Zaiton Samdin, 2022. "A bibliometric analysis of tropical mangrove forest land use change from 2010 to 2020," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11530-11547, October.
    10. Yanhua Zhuang & Chao Du & Liang Zhang & Yun Du & Sisi Li, 2015. "Research trends and hotspots in soil erosion from 1932 to 2013: a literature review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 743-758, November.
    11. Xiaoe Ding & Minrui Zheng & Xinqi Zheng, 2021. "The Application of Genetic Algorithm in Land Use Optimization Research: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Mohammadmahdi Vakilian & Burhanuddin Yeop Majlis & Maryam Mousavi, 2015. "A bibliometric analysis of lab-on-a-chip research from 2001 to 2013," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 789-804, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ajoy Mallik & Nripendranath Mandal, 2014. "Bibliometric analysis of global publication output and collaboration structure study in microRNA research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 2011-2037, March.
    2. Quan Li & Wenbo Wei & Nian Xiong & Daici Feng & Xinyue Ye & Yongsheng Jiang, 2017. "Social Media Research, Human Behavior, and Sustainable Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
    3. Yanhua Zhuang & Chao Du & Liang Zhang & Yun Du & Sisi Li, 2015. "Research trends and hotspots in soil erosion from 1932 to 2013: a literature review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 743-758, November.
    4. Qing Cheng & Xin Lu & Zhong Liu & Jincai Huang, 2015. "Mining research trends with anomaly detection models: the case of social computing research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 453-469, May.
    5. Tapasree Basu & Ajoy Mallik & Nripendranath Mandal, 2017. "Evolving importance of anticancer research using herbal medicine: a scientometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1375-1396, March.
    6. Qing Ji & Xiaoping Pang & Xi Zhao, 2014. "A bibliometric analysis of research on Antarctica during 1993–2012," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 1925-1939, December.
    7. Deming Lin & Tianhui Gong & Wenbin Liu & Martin Meyer, 2020. "An entropy-based measure for the evolution of h index research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2283-2298, December.
    8. Tasso Brandt & Torben Schubert, 2013. "Is the university model an organizational necessity? Scale and agglomeration effects in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(2), pages 541-565, February.
    9. Irena Sajovic & Bojana Boh Podgornik, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Visualizations in Computer Graphics: A Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    10. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.
    11. Péter Sasvári & András Nemeslaki & László Duma, 2019. "Exploring the influence of scientific journal ranking on publication performance in the Hungarian social sciences: the case of law and economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 595-616, May.
    12. Li, Eldon Y. & Liao, Chien Hsiang & Yen, Hsiuju Rebecca, 2013. "Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1515-1530.
    13. Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong, 2017. "Research status of shale gas: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 715-720.
    14. Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge & Elena Corera-Alvarez & Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Félix Moya-Anegón, 2016. "Scientific output of the emerging Cuban biopharmaceutical industry: a scientometric approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1621-1636, September.
    15. Neil C. Mitchell, 2020. "Comparing the post-WWII publication histories of oceanography and marine geoscience," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 843-866, August.
    16. Rosenstreich, Daniela & Wooliscroft, Ben, 2009. "Measuring the impact of accounting journals using Google Scholar and the g-index," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 227-239.
    17. Bertoli-Barsotti, Lucio & Lando, Tommaso, 2015. "On a formula for the h-index," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 762-776.
    18. Qian-Jin Zong & Hong-Zhou Shen & Qin-Jian Yuan & Xiao-Wei Hu & Zhi-Ping Hou & Shun-Guo Deng, 2013. "Doctoral dissertations of Library and Information Science in China: A co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(2), pages 781-799, February.
    19. Vîiu, Gabriel-Alexandru, 2016. "A theoretical evaluation of Hirsch-type bibliometric indicators confronted with extreme self-citation," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 552-566.
    20. Lin Zhu & Xiantao Liu & Sha He & Jun Shi & Ming Pang, 2015. "Keywords co-occurrence mapping knowledge domain research base on the theory of Big Data in oil and gas industry," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 249-260, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:96:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0918-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.