IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v96y2013i1d10.1007_s11192-012-0911-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global trends of solid waste research from 1997 to 2011 by using bibliometric analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Lie Yang

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

  • Zhulei Chen

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

  • Ting Liu

    (Huangshi Institute of Technology)

  • Zhe Gong

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

  • Yingjian Yu

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

  • Jia Wang

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

This study explores a bibliometric approach to quantitatively assessing current research trends on solid waste, by using the related literature published between 1997 and 2011 in journals of all the subject categories of the Science Citation Index. The articles acquired from such literature were concentrated on the general analysis by publication type and language, characteristics of articles outputs, country, subject categories and journals, and the frequency of title-words and keywords used. Over the past 15 years, there had been a notable growth trend in publication outputs, along with more participation of countries/territories. The seven major industrialized countries (G7) published the majority of the world articles, while their article share was being replacing by other countries represented by BRIC countries. An analysis of the title-words, author keywords and keywords plus showed that municipal solid waste and sludge were the major research types of solid wastes and “anaerobic digestion”, “wastewater” and “heavy metals” were recent major topics of solid waste research. Meanwhile, the analysis indicated the analysis technologies, represented by solid-phase extraction and tandem mass-spectrometry, were more and more widely used for solid waste research. Besides, life cycle assessment and health risk assessment were the most two frequently environmental assessment tools used for solid waste research in the 15-year research period.

Suggested Citation

  • Lie Yang & Zhulei Chen & Ting Liu & Zhe Gong & Yingjian Yu & Jia Wang, 2013. "Global trends of solid waste research from 1997 to 2011 by using bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 96(1), pages 133-146, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:96:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0911-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0911-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-012-0911-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-012-0911-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li Ying Yang & Ting Yue & Jie Lan Ding & Tao Han, 2012. "A comparison of disciplinary structure in science between the G7 and the BRIC countries by bibliometric methods," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(2), pages 497-516, November.
    2. Hang Wen & Yi Huang, 2012. "Trends and performance of oxidative stress research from 1991 to 2010," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(1), pages 51-63, April.
    3. Weiwei Zhang & Weihong Qian & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2009. "A bibliometric analysis of research related to ocean circulation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(2), pages 305-316, August.
    4. Kun-Yang Chuang & Ya-Li Huang & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2007. "A bibliometric and citation analysis of stroke-related research in Taiwan," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 72(2), pages 201-212, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bingyao Jia & Yuting Chen & Jing Wu, 2021. "Bibliometric Analysis and Research Trend Forecast of Healthy Urban Planning for 40 Years (1981–2020)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Alicia Mas-Tur & Nikunja Mohan Modak & José M. Merigó & Norat Roig-Tierno & Massimiliano Geraci & Vittorio Capecchi, 2019. "Half a century of Quality & Quantity: a bibliometric review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 981-1020, March.
    3. Lie Yang & Houqing Guo & Huan Chen & Liuyang He & Tiantian Sun, 2018. "A Bibliometric Analysis Of Desalination Research During 1997-2012," Water Conservation & Management (WCM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 18-23, January.
    4. Modak, Nikunja M. & Merigó, José M. & Weber, Richard & Manzor, Felipe & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2019. "Fifty years of Transportation Research journals: A bibliometric overview," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 188-223.
    5. Saeed-Ul Hassan & Peter Haddawy & Jia Zhu, 2014. "A bibliometric study of the world’s research activity in sustainable development and its sub-areas using scientific literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(2), pages 549-579, May.
    6. Jie Zhu & Weijian Hua, 2017. "Visualizing the knowledge domain of sustainable development research between 1987 and 2015: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 893-914, February.
    7. Chengliang Zhang & Tong Xu & Hualiang Feng & Shaohua Chen, 2019. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Landfills: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Baogang Zhang & Ye Liu & Caixing Tian & Zhijun Wang & Ming Cheng & Nan Chen & Chuanping Feng, 2014. "A bibliometric analysis of research on upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) from 1983 to 2012," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 100(1), pages 189-202, July.
    9. Cristina Pérez-Pérez & Diana Benito-Osorio & Susana María García-Moreno & Andrés Martínez-Fernández, 2021. "Is Sharing a Better Alternative for the Planet? The Contribution of Sharing Economy to Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Holman Ospina-Mateus & Leonardo Augusto Quintana Jiménez & Francisco J. Lopez-Valdes & Katherinne Salas-Navarro, 2019. "Bibliometric analysis in motorcycle accident research: a global overview," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(2), pages 793-815, November.
    11. Pengnan Xiao & Yong Zhou & Xigui Li & Jie Xu & Chong Zhao, 2021. "Assessment of Heavy Metals in Agricultural Land: A Literature Review Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Sigifredo Laengle & Nikunja Mohan Modak & Jose M. Merigo & Gustavo Zurita, 2018. "Twenty-Five Years of Group Decision and Negotiation: A Bibliometric Overview," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 505-542, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lie Yang & Houqing Guo & Huan Chen & Liuyang He & Tiantian Sun, 2018. "A Bibliometric Analysis Of Desalination Research During 1997-2012," Water Conservation & Management (WCM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 18-23, January.
    2. Huaqi Chen & Yuehua Wan & Shuian Jiang & Yanxia Cheng, 2014. "Alzheimer’s disease research in the future: bibliometric analysis of cholinesterase inhibitors from 1993 to 2012," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 1865-1877, March.
    3. Hui-Zhen Fu & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2013. "Comparison of independent research of China’s top universities using bibliometric indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 96(1), pages 259-276, July.
    4. Qing Ji & Xiaoping Pang & Xi Zhao, 2014. "A bibliometric analysis of research on Antarctica during 1993–2012," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 1925-1939, December.
    5. Amanda Augusta Fernandes & Cristina Adams & Luciana Gomes de Araujo & João Paulo Romanelli & João Paulo Bispo Santos & Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues, 2022. "Forest Landscape Restoration and Local Stakeholders: A Global Bibliometric Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Hui-Zhen Fu & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2016. "Highly cited Antarctic articles using Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 337-357, October.
    7. Hang Wen & Yi Huang, 2012. "Trends and performance of oxidative stress research from 1991 to 2010," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(1), pages 51-63, April.
    8. Yingjin Song & Ruiyi Li & Guanyi Chen & Beibei Yan & Lei Zhong & Yuxin Wang & Yihang Li & Jinlei Li & Yingxiu Zhang, 2021. "Bibliometric Analysis of Current Status on Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils during 2000–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Maribel Vega-Arce & Gonzalo Salas & Gastón Núñez-Ulloa & Cristián Pinto-Cortez & Ivelisse Torres Fernandez & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2019. "Research performance and trends in child sexual abuse research: a Science Citation Index Expanded-based analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1505-1525, December.
    10. Miroslav Nedelchev, 2018. "Bibliometric Review of Corporate Governance Theories and Methods," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 126-145.
    11. Kaelo Mpho Ntwaepelo, 2021. "The Effects of Macroprudential and Monetary Policy Shocks in BRICS economies," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2021-20, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    12. Marie-Violaine Tatry & Dominique Fournier & Benoît Jeannequin & Françoise Dosba, 2014. "EU27 and USA leadership in fruit and vegetable research: a bibliometric study from 2000 to 2009," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 2207-2222, March.
    13. Janghyeok Yoon & Sungchul Choi & Kwangsoo Kim, 2011. "Invention property-function network analysis of patents: a case of silicon-based thin film solar cells," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(3), pages 687-703, March.
    14. Jielan Ding & Per Ahlgren & Liying Yang & Ting Yue, 2018. "Disciplinary structures in Nature, Science and PNAS: journal and country levels," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 1817-1852, September.
    15. Jiang Tan & Hui-Zhen Fu & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2014. "A bibliometric analysis of research on proteomics in Science Citation Index Expanded," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1473-1490, February.
    16. Slavo Radosevic & Esin Yoruk, 2014. "Are there global shifts in the world science base? Analysing the catching up and falling behind of world regions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 1897-1924, December.
    17. Montoya, Francisco G. & García-Cruz, Amós & Montoya, Maria G. & Manzano-Agugliaro, Francisco, 2016. "Power quality techniques research worldwide: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 846-856.
    18. Meng Lv & Shaohong Feng, 2021. "Temporary teams: current research focus and future directions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Yong Yi & Wei Qi & Dandan Wu, 2013. "Are CIVETS the next BRICs? A comparative analysis from scientometrics perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(2), pages 615-628, February.
    20. Dag W. Aksnes & Thed N. Leeuwen & Gunnar Sivertsen, 2014. "The effect of booming countries on changes in the relative specialization index (RSI) on country level," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1391-1401, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:96:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0911-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.