IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v84y2010i2d10.1007_s11192-009-0132-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Establishment of paper assessment system based on academic disciplinary benchmarks

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Zhang

    (Tianjin University)

  • Huan Zhao

    (Library of Tianjin University, Tianjin University)

  • Qiushi Li

    (Library of Tianjin University, Tianjin University)

  • Juan Wang

    (Tianjin University)

  • Xin Tan

    (Tianjin University)

Abstract

An article assessment system based on both Tianjin University and nine key Chinese Universities’ academic disciplinary benchmarks was established to evaluate researcher’s published papers. With this scientific benchmarking system, the quality of a researcher’s papers could be easily located in a percentile scale in corresponding field within certain groups. Several factors, including total number of papers, order of authors, impact of journals, citation count, h-index, e-index, a-index, m-quotient, etc., were also utilized for both quantity and quality analysis. Furthermore, the novel proposed weighted citation analysis was introduced to judge a researcher’s contribution to his/her research outcomes. The convenient application and comprehensive evaluation property of this assessment system was thoroughly discussed via a given example.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Zhang & Huan Zhao & Qiushi Li & Juan Wang & Xin Tan, 2010. "Establishment of paper assessment system based on academic disciplinary benchmarks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 421-429, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:84:y:2010:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0132-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0132-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-009-0132-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-009-0132-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steve Hanney & Iain Frame & Jonathan Grant & Martin Buxton & Tracey Young & Grant Lewison, 2005. "Using categorisations of citations when assessing the outcomes from health research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 65(3), pages 357-379, December.
    2. B. S. Kademani & Vijai Kumar & Ganesh Surwase & Anil Sagar & Lalit Mohan & Anil Kumar & C. R. Gaderao, 2007. "Research and citation impact of publications by the Chemistry Division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(1), pages 25-57, April.
    3. Narongrit Sombatsompop & Apisit Kositchaiyong & Teerasak Markpin & Sekson Inrit, 2006. "Scientific evaluations of citation quality of international research articles in the SCI database: Thailand case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 66(3), pages 521-535, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erzi Tang & Fengchao Liu & Jia Sun & Zulfqar Haider, 2014. "The relationship between scientists and science: knowledge-based innovation output," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 1827-1835, March.
    2. Quan’e Ren & Xuemei Gong, 2012. "Evaluation index system for academic papers of humanities and social sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 1047-1060, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teresa H. Jones & Claire Donovan & Steve Hanney, 2012. "Tracing the wider impacts of biomedical research: a literature search to develop a novel citation categorisation technique," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(1), pages 125-134, October.
    2. Mehdi Rhaiem & Nabil Amara, 2020. "Determinants of research efficiency in Canadian business schools: evidence from scholar-level data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 53-99, October.
    3. Mingyang Wang & Jiaqi Zhang & Shijia Jiao & Xiangrong Zhang & Na Zhu & Guangsheng Chen, 2020. "Important citation identification by exploiting the syntactic and contextual information of citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2109-2129, December.
    4. Michael C. Calver & J. Stuart Bradley, 2009. "Should we use the mean citations per paper to summarise a journal’s impact or to rank journals in the same field?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(3), pages 611-615, December.
    5. Stremersch, S. & Camacho, N.M.A. & Vanneste, S. & Verniers, I.W.J., 2014. "Unraveling Scientific Impact," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-014-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    6. Stremersch, Stefan & Camacho, Nuno & Vanneste, Sofie & Verniers, Isabel, 2015. "Unraveling scientific impact: Citation types in marketing journals," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 64-77.
    7. Hamid R. Jamali & Majid Nabavi & Saeid Asadi, 2018. "How video articles are cited, the case of JoVE: Journal of Visualized Experiments," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(3), pages 1821-1839, December.
    8. Iman Tahamtan & Askar Safipour Afshar & Khadijeh Ahamdzadeh, 2016. "Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(3), pages 1195-1225, June.
    9. Ehsan Mohammadi & Mike Thelwall, 2013. "Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labels," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(2), pages 383-395, November.
    10. Quan’e Ren & Xuemei Gong, 2012. "Evaluation index system for academic papers of humanities and social sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 1047-1060, December.
    11. P. Vinkler, 2010. "Indicators are the essence of scientometrics and bibliometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(3), pages 861-866, December.
    12. Zhongyi Wang & Keying Wang & Jiyue Liu & Jing Huang & Haihua Chen, 2022. "Measuring the innovation of method knowledge elements in scientific literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2803-2827, May.
    13. Ruhao Zhang & Junpeng Yuan, 2022. "Enhanced author bibliographic coupling analysis using semantic and syntactic citation information," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7681-7706, December.
    14. Lin Zhu & Junjie Zhang & Scott W. Cunningham, 2022. "Domain expertise extraction for finding rising stars," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5475-5495, September.
    15. André Andrian Padial & João Carlos Nabout & Tadeu Siqueira & Luis Mauricio Bini & José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho, 2010. "Weak evidence for determinants of citation frequency in ecological articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(1), pages 1-12, October.
    16. N. Sombatsompop & T. Markpin & T. Buranathiti & P. Ratchatahirun & T. Metheenukul & N. Premkamolnetr & W. Yochai, 2007. "Categorization and trend of materials science research from Science Citation Index (SCI) database: A case study of ceramics, metallurgy, and polymer subfields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(2), pages 283-302, May.
    17. Mehdi Rhaiem, 2017. "Measurement and determinants of academic research efficiency: a systematic review of the evidence," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 581-615, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:84:y:2010:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0132-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.