IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v72y2007i2d10.1007_s11192-007-1714-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transient and continuant authors in a research field: The case of terrorism

Author

Listed:
  • Avishag Gordon

    (University of Haifa
    Israel Institute of Technology)

Abstract

The issue of research continuance in a scientific discipline was analyzed and applied to the field of terrorism. The growing amount of literature in this field is produced mostly by one-timers who “visit” the field, contribute one or two articles, and then move to another subject area. This research pattern does not contribute to the regularity and constancy of publication by which a scientific discipline is formed and theories and paradigms of the field are created. This study observed the research continuance and transience of scientific publications in terrorism by using obtainable “most prolific terrorism authors” lists at different points in time. These lists designed by several terrorism researchers, presented a few researchers who contributed to the field continuously and many others whose main research interest lay in another discipline. The four lists observed included authors who were continuants, transients, new-comers, and terminators (who left the field). The lack of continuous, full-time research in a research field is typical of many disciplines, but the influence of this research pattern on a field’s growth and stability is different for older, established disciplines than for new and formative fields of study. With in the former, intellectual mobility could contribute to the rise of new topics and probably enrich the particular scientific field; with the latter, by contrast, it could hamper the formation and growth of the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Avishag Gordon, 2007. "Transient and continuant authors in a research field: The case of terrorism," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 72(2), pages 213-224, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:72:y:2007:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1714-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1714-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-007-1714-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-007-1714-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tibor Braun & Wolfgang Glänzel & András Schubert, 2001. "Publication and cooperation patterns of the authors of neuroscience journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 50(3), pages 499-510, January.
    2. Wagner, Caroline S. & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2005. "Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1608-1618, December.
    3. Tibor Braun & Wolfgang Glänzel & András Schubert, 2001. "Publication and cooperation patterns of the authors of neuroscience journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 51(3), pages 499-510, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edson Ronaldo Guarido Filho & Clóvis L. Machado-da-Silva & Sandro Aparecido Gonçalves, 2010. "Organizational institutionalism in the academic field in Brazil: social dynamics and networks," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 14(spe), pages 149-172.
    2. Gian Maria Campedelli, 2021. "Where are we? Using Scopus to map the literature at the intersection between artificial intelligence and research on crime," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 503-530, November.
    3. Gregorio González-Alcaide & Pedro Llorente & José M. Ramos, 2016. "Bibliometric indicators to identify emerging research fields: publications on mass gatherings," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 1283-1298, November.
    4. Edoardo Magnone, 2014. "The extreme case of terrorism: a scientometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 179-201, October.
    5. Daphne R. Raban & Avishag Gordon, 2020. "The evolution of data science and big data research: A bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1563-1581, March.
    6. Jeppe Nicolaisen & Tove Faber Frandsen, 2022. "Epistemic community formation: a bibliometric study of recurring authors in medical journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 4167-4189, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Pepe & Marko A. Rodriguez, 2010. "Collaboration in sensor network research: an in-depth longitudinal analysis of assortative mixing patterns," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(3), pages 687-701, September.
    2. Jinseok Kim & Jana Diesner, 2019. "Formational bounds of link prediction in collaboration networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 687-706, May.
    3. Lin Zhang & Wolfgang Glänzel, 2012. "Where demographics meets scientometrics: towards a dynamic career analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(2), pages 617-630, May.
    4. William B. Gartner & Per Davidsson & Shaker A. Zahra, 2006. "Are you Talking to Me? The Nature of Community in Entrepreneurship Scholarship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(3), pages 321-331, May.
    5. Hildrun Kretschmer & Isidro F. Aguillo, 2004. "Visibility of collaboration on the Web," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 61(3), pages 405-426, November.
    6. Jeppe Nicolaisen & Tove Faber Frandsen, 2022. "Epistemic community formation: a bibliometric study of recurring authors in medical journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 4167-4189, July.
    7. Haiyang Lu & Yuqiang Feng, 2009. "A measure of authors’ centrality in co-authorship networks based on the distribution of collaborative relationships," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(2), pages 499-511, November.
    8. Edson Ronaldo Guarido Filho & Clóvis L. Machado-da-Silva & Sandro Aparecido Gonçalves, 2010. "Organizational institutionalism in the academic field in Brazil: social dynamics and networks," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 14(spe), pages 149-172.
    9. Huailan Liu & Zhiwang Chen & Jie Tang & Yuan Zhou & Sheng Liu, 2020. "Mapping the technology evolution path: a novel model for dynamic topic detection and tracking," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2043-2090, December.
    10. Olle Persson & Wolfgang Glänzel & Rickard Danell, 2004. "Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 60(3), pages 421-432, August.
    11. Rodriguez, Marko A. & Pepe, Alberto, 2008. "On the relationship between the structural and socioacademic communities of a coauthorship network," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 195-201.
    12. Wolfgang Glänzel & Mehmet Ali Abdulhayoǧlu, 2018. "Garfield number: on some characteristics of Eugene Garfield’s first and second order co-authorship networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 533-544, February.
    13. Lei Wang & Bart Thijs & Wolfgang Glänzel, 2015. "Characteristics of international collaboration in sport sciences publications and its influence on citation impact," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 843-862, November.
    14. Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo & Carlos Díaz-Contreras & Guillermo Ronda-Velázquez & Jorge Carlos Ronda-Pupo, 2015. "The role of academic collaboration in the impact of Latin-American research on management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1435-1454, February.
    15. Guillaume Cabanac & Gilles Hubert & Béatrice Milard, 2015. "Academic careers in Computer Science: continuance and transience of lifetime co-authorships," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 135-150, January.
    16. Hildrun Kretschmer, 2004. "Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 60(3), pages 409-420, August.
    17. Jan Fagerberg & Bengt-Åke Lundvall & Martin Srholec, 2018. "Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(3), pages 533-556, July.
    18. Albert Banal-Estañol & Inés Macho-Stadler & David Pérez-Castrillo, 2013. "Endogeneous matching in university-industry collaboration: Theory and empirical evidence from the UK," Economics Working Papers 1379, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    19. Carillo, Maria Rosaria & Papagni, Erasmo & Sapio, Alessandro, 2013. "Do collaborations enhance the high-quality output of scientific institutions? Evidence from the Italian Research Assessment Exercise," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 25-36.
    20. Laurent R. Bergé, 2017. "Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(4), pages 785-815, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:72:y:2007:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1714-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.