IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v62y2005i1d10.1007_s11192-005-0003-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of Felsenstein's “Phylogenies and the comparative method” on evolutionary biology

Author

Listed:
  • Priscilla Carvalho

    (Graduate Program in Biology (Ecology), Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás,)

  • José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho

    (Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás)

  • Luis Mauricio Bini

    (Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás)

Abstract

Summary Felsenstein’s (1985) method of phylogenetic independent contrasts is probably the most commonly used technique in evolutionary biology to study adaptation of organisms to their environment, taking phylogeny into account. Here, we performed a scientometric evaluation of all 1462 articles that cited Felsenstein (1985) between 1985 and 2002, in order to analyze the impact of his comparative method on the evolutionary research program and what has been done since it. We found that Felsentein’s (1985) article can be classified as a “hot paper” or a breakthrough contribution, since it was the most cited article from The American Naturalist published in 1985. Also, it can be considered as a “citation classic”, since it is the third more cited paper in The American Naturalist from 1945 to 2002. In general, papers that cited Felsenstein (1985) were published in high-impact journals, and most of them are theoretical articles indicating that biologists are aware of statistical and conceptual problems in dealing with comparative methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Priscilla Carvalho & José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho & Luis Mauricio Bini, 2005. "The impact of Felsenstein's “Phylogenies and the comparative method” on evolutionary biology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 62(1), pages 53-66, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:62:y:2005:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-005-0003-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-005-0003-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-005-0003-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-005-0003-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark William Neff & Elizabeth A. Corley, 2009. "35 years and 160,000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(3), pages 657-682, September.
    2. Denis Réale & Mahdi Khelfaoui & Pierre-Olivier Montiglio & Yves Gingras, 2020. "Mapping the dynamics of research networks in ecology and evolution using co-citation analysis (1975–2014)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1361-1385, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:62:y:2005:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-005-0003-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.