IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v55y2002i2d10.1023_a1019659506195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Authorship patterns in agricultural sciences in Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Hashem Farahat

    (King Saud University)

Abstract

This study examines patterns of authorship in nineteen Egyptian journals of agricultural science. Multiple authorship was found to be the predominant trend in the field and co-authored papers accounted for some 79 percent of the sample. The most common form of multiple authorship involved three people. Considerable variation was found among sub-fields and co-authorship was found to be most common in social-science related agricultural disciplines. The author found no significant differences in patterns of collaboration in the agricultural sciences in Egypt and two the other developing countries for which comparative data was available, India and Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Hashem Farahat, 2002. "Authorship patterns in agricultural sciences in Egypt," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 55(2), pages 157-170, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:55:y:2002:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1019659506195
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1019659506195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1019659506195
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1019659506195?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miranda Lee Pao, 1982. "Collaboration in computational musicology," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 33(1), pages 38-43, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giulia Rivellini & Ester Rizzi & Susanna Zaccarin, 2006. "The science network in Italian population research: An analysis according to the social network perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 67(3), pages 407-418, June.
    2. Radhamany Sooryamoorthy, 2010. "Medical research in South Africa: a scientometric analysis of trends, patterns, productivity and partnership," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(3), pages 863-885, September.
    3. Radhamany Sooryamoorthy, 2009. "Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(2), pages 419-439, August.
    4. Balázs Borsi & András Schubert, 2011. "Agrifood research in Europe: a global perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(1), pages 133-154, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naomi Fukuzawa, 2014. "An empirical analysis of the relationship between individual characteristics and research productivity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(3), pages 785-809, June.
    2. Sameer Kumar & Kuru Ratnavelu, 2016. "Perceptions of Scholars in the Field of Economics on Co-Authorship Associations: Evidence from an International Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Jiale Yang & Qing Wu & Chuanyi Wang, 2022. "Research networks and the initial placement of PhD holders in academia: evidence from social science fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3253-3278, June.
    4. Zhenglu Yu & Zheng Ma & Haiyan Wang & Jia Jia & Lu Wang, 2020. "Communication value of English-language S&T academic journals in non-native English language countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1389-1402, November.
    5. Christopher McCarty & James W. Jawitz & Allison Hopkins & Alex Goldman, 2013. "Predicting author h-index using characteristics of the co-author network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 96(2), pages 467-483, August.
    6. Leo Egghe, 2009. "Performance and its relation with productivity in Lotkaian systems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(2), pages 567-585, November.
    7. McCarty, Christopher & Jawitz, James W., 2013. "Attitudes about publishing and normal science advancement," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 850-858.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:55:y:2002:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1019659506195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.