IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v47y2000i2d10.1023_a1005686123917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communication between Science and Technology Studies Journals: A Case Study in Differentiation and Integration in Scientific Fields

Author

Listed:
  • Peter van den Besselaar

    (University of Amsterdam)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the communication between science and technology journals (STS), to illustrate patterns of differentiation and integration within scientific fields. First the STS field is delineated, using journal-journal citations as the empirical base. A strong and increasing differentiation is found, between 'qualitative STS', 'quantitative STS' (scientometrics), and 'S&T policy studies'. Given this process of differentiation, the relations between the three sub-fields of STS are analyzed, in terms of mutual flows of information, the joint information base, and research topics. Is differentiation and codification of sub-fields visible? The findings suggest that the relations between qualitative and quantitative STS are one-sided, and that integration between the sub-fields is almost completely lacking. However, the relations between scientometrics and S&T policy studies are much stronger and more substantial, and the same is the case for scientometrics and information science.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter van den Besselaar, 2000. "Communication between Science and Technology Studies Journals: A Case Study in Differentiation and Integration in Scientific Fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 47(2), pages 169-193, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:47:y:2000:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1005686123917
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1005686123917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1005686123917
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1005686123917?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jochen Gläser & Grit Laudel, 2001. "Integrating Scientometric Indicators into Sociological Studies: Methodical and Methodological Problems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(3), pages 411-434, November.
    2. Daria Maltseva & Vladimir Batagelj, 2020. "iMetrics: the development of the discipline with many names," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 313-359, October.
    3. Meyer, Martin & Pereira, Tiago Santos & Persson, Olle & Granstrand, Ove, 2004. "The scientometric world of Keith Pavitt: A tribute to his contributions to research policy and patent analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1405-1417, November.
    4. Tiziana Di Cimbrini, 2016. "L?Accounting nella dialettica tra scienza e tecnologia: il caso dei manuali sul mutuo soccorso in Inghilterra ed in Italia tra il XIX e XX secolo," CONTABILIT? E CULTURA AZIENDALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 11-40.
    5. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.
    6. Milojević, Staša & Sugimoto, Cassidy R. & Larivière, Vincent & Thelwall, Mike & Ding, Ying, 2014. "The role of handbooks in knowledge creation and diffusion: A case of science and technology studies," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 693-709.
    7. Staša Milojević & Loet Leydesdorff, 2013. "Information metrics (iMetrics): a research specialty with a socio-cognitive identity?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(1), pages 141-157, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:47:y:2000:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1005686123917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.