IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i2d10.1007_s11192-025-05245-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing examiner citations and applicant citations: insights into technology evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Yali Qiao

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Alan L. Porter

    (Search Technology, Inc.)

  • Ying Huang

    (Wuhan University
    KU Leuven)

  • Haiyun Xu

    (Shandong University of Technology)

  • Xuefeng Wang

    (Beijing Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Patent citation data is widely used in the study of technology evolution, but existing research has overlooked an issue that there may be potential differences between examiner citations and applicant citations, which may introduce biases from examiner citations. Yet, there is still a lack of systematic comparative study on the differences between applicant citations and examiner citations for technology evolution. To address this, we conducted a comprehensive comparison using USPTO patent data across four dimensions: technology profiling, technology relevance, technology diversity, and technology evolution pathways. For our case study, we selected the promising research area of photovoltaic cells. After comparing nine sub-technologies in this area, we have drawn some conclusions: (1) Applicants tend to provide more citations than examiners, and examiners tend to cite more recent patents than applicants; (2) There is no apparent inclination for applicants to avoid citing particularly relevant patents. On average, examiner citations are slightly closer in technological proximity to their invention than those cited by applicants; (3) The degree of diversity for applicant citations, examiner citations, and applicant & examiner citations at a single patent level lacks consistency. However, their average trend by year or by sub-technology is similar after adding examiner citations; (4) Merging family members strongly impacts main pathways through added examiner citations, which is quite contrary in the citation network with only USPTO-granted patents without merging patent members; (5) In sub-technologies at the growth stage, applicants and examiners both cite more recent patents and tend to integrate border technologies from other fields, which can be used as an indicator for evaluating the potential to become emerging. The findings remind us to pay extra attention to the context in which citation data is used to measure technology evolution, and can serve as signals for technology assessment as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Yali Qiao & Alan L. Porter & Ying Huang & Haiyun Xu & Xuefeng Wang, 2025. "Comparing examiner citations and applicant citations: insights into technology evolution," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(2), pages 537-563, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05245-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05245-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05245-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-025-05245-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05245-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.