IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i2d10.1007_s11192-025-05240-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking Departments based on research quality: a statistical evaluation of the ISPD indicator

Author

Listed:
  • Federica Galli

    (University of Bologna)

  • Fedele Greco

    (University of Bologna)

Abstract

Given the relevance of performance-based funding for the Italian University System, in this paper, we analyse the statistical properties of the ISPD indicator used to provide a ranking of the best 180 Italian Departments. Besides the adoption of a standardization procedure and subsequent aggregation, the main flow of the ISPD indicator appears to be its tendency to polarization, which has important consequences on the ability of such indicator to effectively discriminate between outstanding Departments as opposed to those just above the average. Implications on funding allocation are discussed using data on the 2011-2014 Italian research assessment exercise and some proposals on alternative indicators that solve some of the critical aspects of ISPD are sketched.

Suggested Citation

  • Federica Galli & Fedele Greco, 2025. "Ranking Departments based on research quality: a statistical evaluation of the ISPD indicator," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(2), pages 705-725, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05240-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05240-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05240-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-025-05240-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05240-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.