IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i2d10.1007_s11192-024-05220-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Concentration versus excellence: lessons learned of European R&D &I framework programs

Author

Listed:
  • Zsolt T. Kosztyán

    (University of Pannonia: Pannon Egyetem)

  • Frigyes Hausz

    (University of Pannonia: Pannon Egyetem)

  • Tibor Csizmadia

    (University of Pannonia: Pannon Egyetem)

  • Attila Katona

    (University of Pannonia: Pannon Egyetem)

  • István Szabó

    (University of Pannonia: Pannon Egyetem)

  • Beáta Fehérvölgyi

    (University of Pannonia: Pannon Egyetem)

Abstract

Framework programs (FPs) are the main research policy tools of the European Union (EU), attracting substantial attention from policy-makers and scholars. Therefore, an increasing number of studies have investigated the EU’s FPs from various angles; however, very few studies address the effect of the complex nature of the concentration of resources and their implementation. While several studies have examined the concentrations of collaboration structures, much less attention has been given to institutions, especially the concentrations that appear during implementation. Institutions that have been awarded several projects at the same time are forced to share their resources between the running projects, which can make the implementation of the projects riskier and thus jeopardize the project’s outcome. Therefore, the role of project management, which must allocate resources among complex implementation structures, such as multiprojects and programs, across portfolios, is appreciated. The aim of this study was to analyze the progression of the nature of concentration, such as institutional concentration in the four most recent framework programs (FPs), namely, FP5, FP6, FP7, and Horizon 2020 (H2020), and the structural and implementation concentrations in the last two framework programs. The study employed the CORDIS database, which encompasses both institutional and project-related information derived from four distinct framework programs. The findings indicated that the parameters of the collaboration network exhibited minimal changes; however, the concentrations of institutions experienced significant alterations. The concentration of complex project structures increased along with institutional concentration, which in turn led to greater efficiency and productivity and, in this way, excellence. Hence, it can be inferred that the output-increasing effect of the program structure is undermined in the deployment of other implementation structures by the need to share resources among several projects running in parallel. The strategy of using parallel projects involves inherent hazards because of the finite nature of resources, which consists primarily of human talent in the form of researchers. The results currently support policy-makers in three ways: (1) an improved understanding of how implementation structures evolve in EU-funded Framework Programs; (2) strengthened linkages among institutional concentration, productivity and excellence; and (3) insights into the design of the EU FP ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Zsolt T. Kosztyán & Frigyes Hausz & Tibor Csizmadia & Attila Katona & István Szabó & Beáta Fehérvölgyi, 2025. "Concentration versus excellence: lessons learned of European R&D &I framework programs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(2), pages 937-967, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05220-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05220-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-024-05220-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-024-05220-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05220-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.