IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i1d10.1007_s11192-024-05215-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of emotion words by the sciences and other subjects

Author

Listed:
  • John G. Benjafield

    (Brock University)

Abstract

To what extent are emotion words used in anglophone disciplines? The data used to explore this question were the relative frequencies with which each of 20 emotion words occurred in each of 11 disciplines in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities. The subjects examined included astronomy, physics, chemistry, biology, sociology, mathematics, economics, political science, psychology, history, and philosophy. Each discipline was compared with every other discipline in terms of the relative frequencies of their usage of emotion words in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Every emotion word was used by every discipline in both centuries. Overall, there were more positive than negative emotion words used, although it was suggested that the negative emotion words may be more salient. The use of the words pleasure and amusement declined in frequency in the twentieth century in every discipline. By contrast, the word hate increased in frequency in every discipline in the twentieth century. Over the last few decades an increasing number of disciplines have taken an active interest in emotion as a research topic, and the characteristics of a multidisciplinary approach to emotion are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • John G. Benjafield, 2025. "The use of emotion words by the sciences and other subjects," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(1), pages 21-42, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05215-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05215-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-024-05215-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-024-05215-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05215-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.