IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v129y2024i7d10.1007_s11192-024-05060-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diachronic changes in the phrasal complexity of research articles (1970–2020): a cross-disciplinary investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Fan Pan

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

  • Yiying Yang

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

This study investigated the phrasal complexity of academic writing from a diachronic perspective. Specifically, based on a corpus of 1,920 research articles (RAs) from soft disciplines (education and economics) and hard disciplines (medicine and mechanical engineering), this study examined the diachronic changes and disciplinary variations in the phrasal complexity of RAs from 1970 to 2020. Nine noun phrase modifiers from Biber et al.’s (2011) framework were adopted for the measurement of phrasal complexity. Results of diachronic analysis reveal an increasing trend in the phrasal complexity of RAs in the four disciplines over the past 50 years, and this trend is more pronounced in the hard disciplines than in the soft disciplines. In addition, the results show significant disciplinary differences in the use of noun phrase modifiers at most time points, with more clausal modifiers in the soft disciplines and more phrasal modifiers in the hard disciplines. These observed diachronic and disciplinary patterns of use of noun phrase modifiers in RAs are possibly associated with the evolving discipline-related epistemological characteristics. These findings have useful implications for EAP writing research and pedagogy.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan Pan & Yiying Yang, 2024. "Diachronic changes in the phrasal complexity of research articles (1970–2020): a cross-disciplinary investigation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4395-4421, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05060-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05060-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-024-05060-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-024-05060-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger E. Backhouse, 2015. "Revisiting Samuelson's Foundations of Economic Analysis," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 53(2), pages 326-350, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dennis L. Weisman, 2021. "The Mathematical Revolution in Economics: Factor Flows in the Production of Academics," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 66(2), pages 202-221, October.
    2. Stuart Holland & Andrew Black, 2018. "Cherchez la Firme: Redressing the Missing – Meso – Middle in Mainstream Economics," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 15-53, November.
    3. Stavros, Drakopoulos, 2021. "The Relation of Neoclassical Economics to other Disciplines: The case of Physics and Psychology," MPRA Paper 106597, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Stavros A. DRAKOPOULOS, 2016. "Economic crisis, economic methodology and the scientific ideal of physics," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 28-57, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05060-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.