IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v126y2021i12d10.1007_s11192-021-04189-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using ego-network analyses to examine journal citations: a comparative study of public administration, political science, and business management

Author

Listed:
  • Glenn S. McGuigan

    (Penn State Harrisburg Library, Penn State University Libraries)

  • Göktuğ Morçöl

    (Penn State Harrisburg)

  • Travis Grosser

    (University of Connecticut)

Abstract

This study demonstrates how social network analysis, specifically ego-network analysis, can be used as a methodology to investigate the degrees of the isolation, insularity, and prestige of academic journals in a particular field in relation to other fields. Using the example of journals in public administration for illustrative purposes, we analyze the network of connections between journals in this field and the ones in two related fields: political science and business/management. Earlier studies found that the research in public administration was largely isolated from the three disciplines that were its foundations: law, management, and political science. Using ego-network analyses and ratio calculations from the Web of Science citation data, we found that the top journals of public administration were indeed relatively isolated in the years 2005, 2010, and 2015. Of the public administration journals, Public Administration Review (PAR) and the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART) were increasingly more recognized (less isolated and became more prestigious) among the journals in other fields. This methodology can be applied to the journals in other fields to study the relations between fields, particularly the relative academic prestige of the fields, in terms of journal citations.

Suggested Citation

  • Glenn S. McGuigan & Göktuğ Morçöl & Travis Grosser, 2021. "Using ego-network analyses to examine journal citations: a comparative study of public administration, political science, and business management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(12), pages 9345-9368, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:12:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04189-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-04189-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-021-04189-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-021-04189-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larry M. Lane & Gary L. Wamsley, 1998. "Gulick and the american presidency: vision, reality, and consequences," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2-4), pages 375-440.
    2. J. A. García & Rosa Rodriguez-Sánchez & J. Fdez-Valdivia, 2012. "Scientific subject categories of Web of Knowledge ranked according to their multidimensional prestige of influential journals," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(5), pages 1017-1029, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:12:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04189-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.