IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v119y2019i2d10.1007_s11192-019-03075-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Publications from university-affiliated anaesthesiology departments: a look at Belgium, France and the Netherlands from 2001 to 2015

Author

Listed:
  • Evelien Cools

    (Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève)

  • Julia Ausserer

    (Medical University of Innsbruck)

  • Marc Velde

    (University Hospitals Leuven
    KU Leuven)

  • Peter Hamm

    (Medical University of Innsbruck)

  • Peter Paal

    (Hospitallers Brothers Hospital of St. John
    Paracelsus Medical University)

Abstract

Publication performance of academic departments hints at research activity and attractiveness for employees. The aim of this retrospective bibliographic study was to compare publication performance of academic anaesthesiology departments in Belgium, France and the Netherlands. Outcome measures were number of publications, original articles and number of citations per department, number of publications per anaesthesiologist and per capita and average impact factor per department. Articles published by university-affiliated anaesthesiology departments between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2015 were included. Articles were imported from Medline into the databank with “Perl-Scripts” and electronically linked to academic anaesthesiology departments according to the affiliation field of the corresponding author. Publication performance was assessed for the periods 2001–2005, 2006–2010, 2011–2015 and 2001–2015. From 2001 to 2015 in all three countries, the absolute numbers of articles increased (+ 110%), while the number of original research articles decreased (− 53%). Paris Diderot (Paris 7) booked the largest number of publications and achieved the highest average impact factor, while Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6) published the largest number of original articles and achieved the highest number of citations. Besançon had the highest average impact factor per article and the Netherlands the largest number of publications per capita. In Belgium, France and the Netherlands, the number of publications increased from 2001 to 2015. From 2001 to 2015 the number of publications increased, while the number of original articles decreased. France was seen to have the largest number of publications, while Belgium and the Netherlands had more publications per capita.

Suggested Citation

  • Evelien Cools & Julia Ausserer & Marc Velde & Peter Hamm & Peter Paal, 2019. "Publications from university-affiliated anaesthesiology departments: a look at Belgium, France and the Netherlands from 2001 to 2015," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 863-878, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:119:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03075-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03075-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-019-03075-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-019-03075-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ewen Callaway, 2016. "Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric," Nature, Nature, vol. 535(7611), pages 210-211, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karin Langenkamp & Bodo Rödel & Kerstin Taufenbach & Meike Weiland, 2018. "Open Access in Vocational Education and Training Research," Publications, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Battiston, Pietro & Sacco, Pier Luigi & Stanca, Luca, 2022. "Cover effects on citations uncovered: Evidence from Nature," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    3. Shahd Al-Janabi & Lee Wei Lim & Luca Aquili, 2021. "Development of a tool to accurately predict UK REF funding allocation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 8049-8062, September.
    4. Wojciech Charemza & Michal Lewandowski & Lukasz Wozny, 2021. "Efficiency in rewarding academic journal publications. The case of Poland," KAE Working Papers 2021-062, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis.
    5. Martin Grančay & Jolita Vveinhardt & Ērika Šumilo, 2017. "Publish or perish: how Central and Eastern European economists have dealt with the ever-increasing academic publishing requirements 2000–2015," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1813-1837, June.
    6. , Aisdl, 2021. "Top economics universities and research institutions in Vietnam: evidence from the SSHPA dataset," OSF Preprints xvnkj, Center for Open Science.
    7. Qingnan Xie & Richard B. Freeman, 2020. "The Contribution of Chinese Diaspora Researchers to Global Science and China's Catching Up in Scientific Research," NBER Working Papers 27169, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Antonia Gogoglou & Antonis Sidiropoulos & Dimitrios Katsaros & Yannis Manolopoulos, 2017. "The fractal dimension of a citation curve: quantifying an individual’s scientific output using the geometry of the entire curve," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1751-1774, June.
    9. Paul Sebo & Jean Pascal Fournier & Claire Ragot & Pierre-Henri Gorioux & François R. Herrmann & Hubert Maisonneuve, 2019. "Factors associated with publication speed in general medical journals: a retrospective study of bibliometric data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 1037-1058, May.
    10. Ioan Ianoş & Alexandru-Ionuţ Petrişor, 2020. "An Overview of the Dynamics of Relative Research Performance in Central-Eastern Europe Using a Ranking-Based Analysis Derived from SCImago Data," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-25, July.
    11. Zhesi Shen & Liying Yang & Zengru Di & Jinshan Wu, 2019. "Large enough sample size to rank two groups of data reliably according to their means," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(2), pages 653-671, February.
    12. Tatiana Lisitskaya & Pavel Taranov & Ekaterina Ugnich & Vladimir Pislyakov, 2024. "Pillar Universities in Russia: Bibliometrics of ‘the second best’," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 365-383, February.
    13. Pislyakov, Vladimir, 2022. "On some properties of medians, percentiles, baselines, and thresholds in empirical bibliometric analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    14. Tian-Yuan Huang & Liying Yang, 2022. "Superior identification index: Quantifying the capability of academic journals to recognize good research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 4023-4043, July.
    15. Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Aamir Raoof Memon, 2017. "CiteScore: A cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(1), pages 553-556, April.
    16. Cortés-Sánchez, Julián David, 2019. "Bibliometric outlook of the most cited documents in business, management and accounting in Ibero-America," SocArXiv cqa3z, Center for Open Science.
    17. Drivas, Kyriakos & Kremmydas, Dimitris, 2020. "The Matthew effect of a journal's ranking," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(4).
    18. Osterloh, Margit & Frey, Bruno S., 2020. "How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:119:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03075-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.