IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v116y2018i2d10.1007_s11192-018-2759-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citation inflation: the effect of not correcting the scientific literature sufficiently, a case study in the plant sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
  • Judit Dobránszki

    (University of Debrecen)

Abstract

In forestry, the Pterocarpus genus is important for the wood industry as this is a tree that is highly valued for its timber. Biotechnological research on this tree genus therefore needs to be carefully examined, even at the post-publication stage. In this paper, we examine how a near-duplicate copy of a 2004 paper published in a leading plant science and biotechnology Springer Nature journal, In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology—Plant, was corrected, rather than retracted. The near-duplicate paper has been cited a total of 16 times, according to the Web of Science, and since 2015, when the paper was first corrected, four citations have emerged. These additional citations for the corrected paper support our claim that the corrected paper should have been retracted, i.e., that the literature was insufficiently corrected, which may have prevented the citation of this near-duplicate paper. Readers who cited the near-duplicate paper after the erratum had been published were either unaware of the correction, or ignored it. Post-publication peer review needs to be more integrated into the publishing framework. We suggest a corrective mechanism by Clarivate Analytics to correct the journal impact factor to avoid citation inflation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Judit Dobránszki, 2018. "Citation inflation: the effect of not correcting the scientific literature sufficiently, a case study in the plant sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 1213-1222, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:116:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2759-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2759-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-018-2759-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-018-2759-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teixeira da Silva Jaime A., 2017. "COPE Requires Greater Consistency and Accountability," Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 11-13, January.
    2. Sophien Kamoun & Cyril Zipfel, 2016. "Class uncorrected errors as misconduct," Nature, Nature, vol. 531(7593), pages 173-173, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Judit Dobránszki & Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, 2019. "Corrective factors for author- and journal-based metrics impacted by citations to accommodate for retractions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(1), pages 387-398, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teixeira da Silva Jaime A., 2020. "Self-Plagiarism in AAAS Science Article about Pubpeer’s President, Brandon Stell," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 171-178, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:116:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2759-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.