IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v108y2016i3d10.1007_s11192-016-2028-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do statistics in dental articles differ from those articles published in highly visible medical journals?

Author

Listed:
  • Hannu Vähänikkilä

    (University of Oulu
    Medical Research Center Oulu
    Oulu University Hospital)

  • Jorma I. Virtanen

    (University of Oulu
    Medical Research Center Oulu
    Oulu University Hospital)

  • Pentti Nieminen

    (University of Oulu)

Abstract

Statistical methods play an important role in medical and dental research. Earlier studies have found that the current use of methods and statistical reporting lead to errors in interpreting results. This study aimed to compare statistical methods and reporting between dental articles and reports published in highly visible medical journals. We analyzed 200 papers published in 2010 in five dental journals and 240 papers published between 2007 and 2011 in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and the Lancet. We summarized the characteristics of the informed authors, classified the articles by study design type and reviewed the main strategy in the analysis of the primary research question. We also assessed the frequency with which the articles report various statistical methods. We then examined the differences between the dental and medical articles. The median number of authors in articles in the dental versus those in the Lancet and NEJM articles was 5 versus 12. International co-operation in the dental journals was lower than in the medical journals. The proportion of papers reporting “significant” results was 62.5 % in the dental journals and 48.3 % in the Lancet and the NEJM. The percentage frequencies of statistical procedures used in the two sets of articles indicate a broader use of statistical methods in the Lancet and the NEJM, and that both journals were significantly more likely to use advanced statistical methods. Improving the application and presentation of statistical methods in dental articles is essential to meeting the current and future goals of dental research.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannu Vähänikkilä & Jorma I. Virtanen & Pentti Nieminen, 2016. "How do statistics in dental articles differ from those articles published in highly visible medical journals?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1417-1424, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:108:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2028-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2028-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-016-2028-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-016-2028-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Strasak, Alexander M. & Zaman, Qamruz & Marinell, Gerhard & Pfeiffer, Karl P. & Ulmer, Hanno, 2007. "[MEDICINE] The Use of Statistics in Medical Research: A Comparison of The New England Journal of Medicine and Nature Medicine," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 61, pages 47-55, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pentti Nieminen & Hannu Vähänikkilä, 2020. "Use of Data Analysis Methods in Dental Publications: Is There Evidence of a Methodological Change?," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jelte M Wicherts & Marjan Bakker & Dylan Molenaar, 2011. "Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical Results," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-7, November.
    2. Kennedy N Otwombe & Max Petzold & Neil Martinson & Tobias Chirwa, 2014. "A Review of the Study Designs and Statistical Methods Used in the Determination of Predictors of All-Cause Mortality in HIV-Infected Cohorts: 2002–2011," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-6, February.
    3. Tracey L Weissgerber, 2021. "Training early career researchers to use meta-research to improve science: A participant-guided “learn by doing” approach," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-5, February.
    4. Tracey L Weissgerber & Vesna D Garovic & Jelena S Milin-Lazovic & Stacey J Winham & Zoran Obradovic & Jerome P Trzeciakowski & Natasa M Milic, 2016. "Reinventing Biostatistics Education for Basic Scientists," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:108:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2028-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.