IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v102y2015i1d10.1007_s11192-014-1349-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Latin American scientific output in Public Health: combined analysis using bibliometric, socioeconomic and health indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez

    (CSIC, Institute of Public Goods and Policies)

  • Grisel Zacca-González

    (Department of Teaching and Research, National Medical Sciences Information Centre Infomed)

  • Benjamín Vargas-Quesada

    (Department of Information & Communication, University of Granada)

  • Félix Moya-Anegón

    (CSIC, Institute of Public Goods and Policies)

Abstract

This study characterizes the volume and visibility of Latin American scientific output in the area of Public Health, through a combined analysis of bibliometric, socioeconomic and health indicators of the top 10 Latin American producers of documents. The information was obtained from the SCImago Institutions Rankings (SIR) portal, based on Scopus data, in the category Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, of the area Medicine, for the period 2003–2011. Our scientometric analysis involved a set of quantitative indicators (based on document recount), plus performance ones to measure impact and excellence (based on citation recount) and international collaboration. The socioeconomic indicators measured investment in health and in research, and the number of researchers. Basic health indicators were used, along with the inequity indicator known as INIQUIS. The main results reveal that the research systems with the greatest capacity to communicate scientific results are those of Brazil and Mexico, and potentially Colombia and Argentina. The best visibility was demonstrated by Uruguay, Puerto Rico and Peru, countries with high rates of collaboration. No single country stands out as having a perfectly balanced relationship regarding all the dimensions analyzed. A relative balance is achieved by Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina, though with different levels of scientific output. The tangible achievements in health attained by Cuba and Chile do not appear to be related with the results of research published in the area of Public Health. There is clearly a need to find methods that would allow us to evaluate the transfer of research knowledge into practice, by means of the scientometric perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Grisel Zacca-González & Benjamín Vargas-Quesada & Félix Moya-Anegón, 2015. "Latin American scientific output in Public Health: combined analysis using bibliometric, socioeconomic and health indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 609-628, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1349-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1349-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-014-1349-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-014-1349-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leo Egghe & Ronald Rousseau, 2000. "Partial orders and measures for language preferences," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 51(12), pages 1123-1130.
    2. Thed N. Van Leeuwen & Henk F. Moed & Robert J. W. Tijssen & Martijn S. Visser & Anthony F. J. Van Raan, 2001. "Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 51(1), pages 335-346, April.
    3. Wolfgang Glänzel & Jacqueline Leta & Bart Thijs, 2006. "Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 67(1), pages 67-86, April.
    4. González-Pereira, Borja & Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P. & Moya-Anegón, Félix, 2010. "A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 379-391.
    5. Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Maria Benavent-Pérez & Félix Moya-Anegón & Sandra Miguel, 2012. "International collaboration in Medical Research in Latin America and the Caribbean (2003–2007)," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(11), pages 2223-2238, November.
    6. Wolfgang Glänzel & Jacqueline Leta & Bart Thijs, 2006. "Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 67(1), pages 67-86, April.
    7. L. Egghe & R. Rousseau & M. Yitzhaki, 1999. "The “own-language preference”: Measures of relative language self-citation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 45(2), pages 217-232, June.
    8. Félix Moya-Anegón & Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Benjamín Vargas-Quesada & Elena Corera-Álvarez & Francisco José Muñoz-Fernández & Antonio González-Molina & Victor Herrero-Solana, 2007. "Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 73(1), pages 53-78, October.
    9. Félix Moya-Anegón & Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote & Lutz Bornmann & Henk F. Moed, 2013. "The research guarantors of scientific papers and the output counting: a promising new approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(2), pages 421-434, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ernesto Galbán-Rodríguez & Deborah Torres-Ponjuán & Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge, 2021. "Multidimensional quantitative analysis of the Cuban scientific output and its regional context," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2643-2665, March.
    2. Sánchez-Jiménez, Rodrigo & Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P. & Moya-Anegón, Félix, 2017. "The role of guarantor in scientific collaboration: The neighbourhood matters," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 103-116.
    3. Minxi Wang & Ping Liu & Rui Zhang & Zhi Li & Xin Li, 2020. "A Scientometric Analysis of Global Health Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Bahaa Ibrahim, 2018. "Arab Spring’s effect on scientific productivity and research performance in Arab countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(3), pages 1555-1586, December.
    5. Hamdi A. Al-Jamimi & Galal M. BinMakhashen & Lutz Bornmann, 2022. "Use of bibliometrics for research evaluation in emerging markets economies: a review and discussion of bibliometric indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(10), pages 5879-5930, October.
    6. Antonio Cavacini, 2016. "Recent trends in Middle Eastern scientific production," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 423-432, October.
    7. Hamdi A. Al-Jamimi & Galal M. BinMakhashen & Lutz Bornmann & Yousif Ahmed Al Wajih, 2023. "Saudi Arabia research: academic insights and trend analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(10), pages 5595-5627, October.
    8. Boglárka Németh & Károly Németh & Jon N. Procter, 2021. "Informed Geoheritage Conservation: Determinant Analysis Based on Bibliometric and Sustainability Indicators Using Ordination Techniques," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-31, May.
    9. Gerardo Urrutia Sánchez & Lilian Prado & Wolfgang Bietenholz, 2018. "Theoretical high energy physcis in Latin America from 1990 to 2012: a statistical study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 125-146, July.
    10. Anastasia Kazun, 2017. "Agenda-Setting in Russian Media," HSE Working papers WP BRP 49/PS/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    11. Anastasia Kazun & Anton Kazun, 2017. "Coverage of Three Tragedies in the Russian Media: Application of the Network Agenda Model," HSE Working papers WP BRP 48/PS/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge & Félix Moya-Anegón & Elena Corera-Álvarez, 2015. "Somes patterns of Cuban scientific publication in Scopus: the current situation and challenges," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(3), pages 779-794, June.
    2. Maria Cláudia Cabrini Grácio & Ely Francina Tannuri Oliveira & Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Henk F. Moed, 2020. "Does corresponding authorship influence scientific impact in collaboration: Brazilian institutions as a case of study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1349-1369, November.
    3. Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Cassidy R Sugimoto & Vincent Larivière, 2019. "Follow the leader: On the relationship between leadership and scholarly impact in international collaborations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Sandra Miguel & Félix Moya-Anegón, 2015. "What factors affect the visibility of Argentinean publications in humanities and social sciences in Scopus? Some evidence beyond the geographic realm of research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 789-810, January.
    5. Maxim N. Kotsemir & Tatiana E. Kuznetsova & Elena G. Nasybulina & Anna G. Pikalova, 2015. "Empirical Analysis of Multinational S&T Collaboration Priorities –The Case of Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 53/STI/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    6. Waltman, Ludo, 2016. "A review of the literature on citation impact indicators," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 365-391.
    7. Ponomariov, Branco & Toivanen, Hannes, 2014. "Knowledge flows and bases in emerging economy innovation systems: Brazilian research 2005–2009," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 588-596.
    8. Jacques Wainer & Eduardo C. Xavier & Fabio Bezerra, 2009. "Scientific production in Computer Science: A comparative study of Brazil and other countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(2), pages 535-547, November.
    9. Júlio Cesar Rodrigues Pereira & Juliana Parreira Vasconcellos & Lucilla Furusawa & Augusto De Moura Barbati, 2007. "Who’s who and what’s what in Brazilian Public Health Sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 73(1), pages 37-52, October.
    10. Sandra Miguel & Claudia M. González & Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez, 2024. "Towards a new approach to analyzing the geographical scope of national research. An exploratory analysis at the country level," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 3659-3679, July.
    11. André Frazão Helene & Pedro Leite Ribeiro, 2011. "Brazilian scientific production, financial support, established investigators and doctoral graduates," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 89(2), pages 677-686, November.
    12. Mauro Vitor Mendlowicz & Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho & Jerson Laks & Leonardo Franklin Fontenelle & Alexandre Martins Valença & William Berger & Ivan Figueira & Gláucia Azambuja Aguiar, 2011. "Is there a ‘gender gap’ in authorship of the main Brazilian psychiatric journals at the beginning of the 21st century?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(1), pages 27-37, January.
    13. Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote & Félix Moya-Anegón, 2014. "Relationship between downloads and citations at journal and paper levels, and the influence of language," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1043-1065, November.
    14. Natascha Helena Franz Hoppen & Samile Andréa de Souza Vanz, 2023. "The development of Brazilian women’s and gender studies: a bibliometric diagnosis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 227-261, January.
    15. Carla Mara Hilário & Maria Cláudia Cabrini Grácio, 2017. "Scientific collaboration in Brazilian researches: a comparative study in the information science, mathematics and dentistry fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 929-950, November.
    16. Ping Zhou & Wolfgang Glänzel, 2010. "In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 82(3), pages 597-612, March.
    17. Renata R. Gonçalves & Christian Kieling & Rodrigo A. Bressan & Jair J. Mari & Luis A. Rohde, 2009. "The evaluation of scientific productivity in Brazil: An assessment of the mental health field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(2), pages 529-537, August.
    18. Amalia Mas-Bleda & Mike Thelwall, 2016. "Can alternative indicators overcome language biases in citation counts? A comparison of Spanish and UK research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 2007-2030, December.
    19. Ed J. Rinia & Thed N. van Leeuwen & Eppo E. W. Bruins & Hendrik G. van Vuren & Anthony F. J. van Raan, 2002. "Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 54(3), pages 347-362, July.
    20. Eva O.L. Lantsoght & Miguel Abambres & Tiago Ribeiro & Ana Sousa, 2019. "Interviewing and Hiring Practices in Brazilian Academia: Proposals Towards Improvement," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-10, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1349-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.