IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rvmgts/v18y2024i6d10.1007_s11846-023-00666-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zombie firms and disclosures in the expanded audit report

Author

Listed:
  • Nora Muñoz-Izquierdo

    (CUNEF University)

  • José Manuel Jiménez Mazarío

    (Complutense University of Madrid)

  • María-del-Mar Camacho-Miñano

    (Complutense University of Madrid)

Abstract

We examine whether expanded audit report (EAR) disclosures classified as the audit opinion, going concern uncertainty paragraphs (GCUPs), emphasis of matter paragraphs (EMPs) and key audit matters (KAMs) are associated with the determinants of zombie firms. Theoretically, zombies are inefficient, unprofitable and highly leveraged firms that receive subsidized credit and consume resources that should be allocated to more efficient firms, reducing productivity growth in the economy. Using a sample of Spanish firms during 2017, the period in which the expanded audit standards were implemented, univariate analysis produces support for our expectations, suggesting that zombies are smaller and more indebted, tend to report losses and have EARs that include more disclosures than non-zombies. Our regression results indicate that GCUPs, EMPs, going concern KAMs and KAMs related to the valuation of current assets are more likely to be reported for zombies. Furthermore, the economic significance of GCUPs allows us to offer a new classification of zombies, contributing to zombie theory. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on the identification of zombie firms using external audit data and the first to analyze other EAR disclosures apart from KAMs. Our findings may have relevant implications for financial statement users, audit firms, standard setters, financial institutions and governments regarding the usefulness and zombie explanatory ability of EARs.

Suggested Citation

  • Nora Muñoz-Izquierdo & José Manuel Jiménez Mazarío & María-del-Mar Camacho-Miñano, 2024. "Zombie firms and disclosures in the expanded audit report," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1519-1555, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:18:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11846-023-00666-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11846-023-00666-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11846-023-00666-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11846-023-00666-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:18:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11846-023-00666-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.