IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v7y2017i1d10.1134_s2079970517010038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the aesthetic landscape properties for managing areas of outstanding natural beauty and historical significance

Author

Listed:
  • E. Yu. Kolbovsky

    (Moscow State University)

  • U. A. Medovikova

    (Moscow State University)

Abstract

The restoration of historical cultural landscapes, which has become increasingly widespread in developed countries, has resurrected two common approaches based on a specific set of measures applied for landscape reconstruction and preservation (area management plans) and landscape and visual impact assessment (so-called LVIA). The development of area management plans is associated with the evolving concept of a target state, in which the landscape preserves its functionality and possesses the properties of a historical reference model. Such properties are sought using geographic information systems and old map sources, in the course of reconstruction of landscape history. The implementation of LVIA requires prior structural modeling of a visual space in relation to its observers, photographs, and the revealing roles of individual components in forming landscape scenes, as well as determination of visual deformations that negatively affect the aesthetic properties of the landscape. Adverse aesthetic changes may occur as a result of both new actions in development of the area and the natural dynamics of the landscape and its “wilding” (ecorehabilitation). The design of a three-dimensional cultural landscape computer model, supplemented by step by step parameterization of potential changes, makes it possible to objectify the entire process of evaluating acceptable impact on the aesthetic properties of a landscape and to apply this model for solving conflict issues associated with the development of areas of outstanding natural beauty and historical significance.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Yu. Kolbovsky & U. A. Medovikova, 2017. "Assessment of the aesthetic landscape properties for managing areas of outstanding natural beauty and historical significance," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 81-88, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:7:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1134_s2079970517010038
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970517010038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970517010038
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970517010038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marjanne Sevenant & Marc Antrop, 2011. "Landscape Representation Validity: A Comparison between On-site Observations and Photographs with Different Angles of View," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 363-385.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuting Wang & Shujian Wang & Ming Xu, 2022. "Landscape Perception Identification and Classification Based on Electroencephalogram (EEG) Features," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-12, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gianni Talamini & Ting Liu & Roula El-Khoury & Di Shao, 2023. "Visibility and symbolism of corporate architecture: A multi-method approach for visual impact assessment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(9), pages 2407-2429, November.
    2. Ling Qiu & Qujing Chen & Tian Gao, 2021. "The Effects of Urban Natural Environments on Preference and Self-Reported Psychological Restoration of the Elderly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Julian Manning & Catriona Macleod & Vanessa Lucieer, 2023. "Seascape Visual Characterization: Combining Viewing Geometry and Physical Features to Quantify the Perception of Seascape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Jaewon Han & Sugie Lee, 2023. "Verification of Immersive Virtual Reality as a Streetscape Evaluation Method in Urban Residential Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Nuno de Santos Loureiro, 2023. "Photography, Land-Cover and Land-Use Changes, and Tourism Urbanization: A Narrative Focused on Hotel do Garbe, Armação de Pêra, Algarve, Portugal," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Olexandr Nekhay & Manuel Arriaza, 2016. "How Attractive Is Upland Olive Groves Landscape? Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and GIS in Southern Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Yifan Duan & Shuhua Li, 2022. "Effects of Plant Communities on Human Physiological Recovery and Emotional Reactions: A Comparative Onsite Survey and Photo Elicitation Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Jiaying Shi & Tsuyoshi Honjo & Kaixuan Zhang & Katsunori Furuya, 2020. "Using Virtual Reality to Assess Landscape: A Comparative Study Between On-Site Survey and Virtual Reality of Aesthetic Preference and Landscape Cognition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Yifan Duan & Shuhua Li, 2022. "Study of Different Vegetation Types in Green Space Landscape Preference: Comparison of Environmental Perception in Winter and Summer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Rossetti, Tomás & Hurtubia, Ricardo, 2020. "An assessment of the ecological validity of immersive videos in stated preference surveys," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    11. Pisaniello, John D. & Tingey-Holyoak, Joanne L. & Burritt, Roger L., 2013. "Dual-extreme cumulative impacts and threats in agricultural catchments: The need for effective integrated policy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 103-112.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:7:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1134_s2079970517010038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.