IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v14y2024i2d10.1134_s207997052460077x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barrier Function and Transport Accessibility of State Border as Factors of Cross-Border Interactions

Author

Listed:
  • A. B. Sebentsov

    (RANEPA
    Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • M. S. Karpenko

    (RANEPA
    Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • K. A. Morachevskaya

    (RANEPA
    St. Petersburg State University)

  • A. V. Sheludkov

    (Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

The intensive integration and cross-border regionalization observed at many interstate borders in Europe in recent decades have made the concept of barriers at the state borders extremely popular. Low border barriers are rightly perceived by researchers as one of the necessary conditions for intensive cross-border cooperation, and as its regular outcome. However, when assessing barrier properties, many researchers focused exclusively on the state border line itself, ignoring the transport and communication properties of the adjacent territories. The authors of the article propose their own, combined method of assessment of transport accessibility and barrier capacity of the border, tested on the Russian−Kazakhstan and Russian−Belarusian sections of the border. The essence of the method consists in calculating the transport accessibility of border crossing points for the populated areas of border regions, taking into account the configuration of the transport network. The advantage of the method is that it allows to compare borders of varying degrees of openness and to obtain an idea of what part of the territory and population on both sides of the border can be involved in cross-border relations. The study showed that due to the almost complete absence of border controls, the Russian−Belarusian border has higher transport permeability and better preservation of the transport network. All this ensures a high level of transport accessibility for the border population. In the Russian−Kazakhstan border region, where the number and density of border crossing points are lower and the state of the network of border roads is much worse, a relatively high level of transport accessibility of the border is characteristic of a small number of regions. With the reduction in the number of checkpoints in the 2000s, the length of “deadlocked” borders has increased: they are borders that are difficult or inaccessible to the regional population. A comparative analysis of the population’s cross-border practices and calculations of transport accessibility showed that the transport accessibility of the border and the neighbor there, barriers and permeability of the border are of a potential nature, that is, they do not account for cross-border contacts in themselves. The specific territorial context, the fundamental socioeconomic and political characteristics and the current situation, as well as historical and cultural factors also influence the implementation of the potential for the border and neighbor accessibility.

Suggested Citation

  • A. B. Sebentsov & M. S. Karpenko & K. A. Morachevskaya & A. V. Sheludkov, 2024. "Barrier Function and Transport Accessibility of State Border as Factors of Cross-Border Interactions," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 209-221, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:14:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1134_s207997052460077x
    DOI: 10.1134/S207997052460077X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S207997052460077X
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S207997052460077X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:14:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1134_s207997052460077x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.