IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v14y2024i1d10.1134_s2079970524600677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Post-Soviet Cities 15-Minute Cities? Differences in Pedestrian Accessibility of Basic Urban Services by Residential Development Morphotypes in Krasnodar, Saratov, and Naberezhnye Chelny

Author

Listed:
  • P. O. Gonyukhov

    (HSE University)

  • A. V. Sheludkov

    (HSE University
    Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

The 15-minute city concept suggests redesigning cities and urban areas in such a way that every resident could reach basic necessities and services, including education, medicine, shopping, leisure, etc., within a 15-minute walk or bicycle ride. The underlying goal of the concept is to improve urban environment, to reduce pressure on transportation systems, and to make cities more resilient to events like the COVID-19 pandemic, when many cities imposed restrictions on cars and public transport. In this paper, we use the 15‑minute city concept as an analytical framework for an accessibility index describing the quality of the urban environment in contemporary Russian cities. The study is based on the assumption that the morphologically heterogeneous environment of the post-Soviet cities creates different conditions for the location of facilities that provide residents with basic necessities and services; as a consequence, the accessibility of these facilities varies greatly within cities. Three large and morphologically different post-Soviet cities, Krasnodar, Saratov, and Naberezhnye Chelny, were chosen as the study cases. The investigation draws on publicly available data as well as data from 2GIS on social, commercial, and transportation infrastructure. From our results, the highest accessibility of the facilities is observed in the historical city centers, which concentrate the facilities that provide unique and city-wide services. The Soviet microdistricts show the higher accessibility values compared to modern high-rise multi-unit residential buildings, while the lowest accessibility is observed in the low-rise neighborhoods: the average walking time to the basic services and facilities here is three times longer than in the historical centers, and twice as long as in the Soviet microdistricts. Among the three cities studied, Naberezhnye Chelny is the closest to the 15-minute city model. For daily demand facilities, the accessibility varies little between the cities, with 86.0 to 92.2% of residents living within 15-minute walking distance. The strongest differences between cities and urban areas of different morphological types in the accessibility of the facilities are observed only when including in the index rare facilities that provide unique and city-wide services, such as hospitals, theaters, universities, etc. Their accessibility can be improved, for example, by developing public transport systems or creating sub-centers of urban activity in high-density residential areas.

Suggested Citation

  • P. O. Gonyukhov & A. V. Sheludkov, 2024. "Are Post-Soviet Cities 15-Minute Cities? Differences in Pedestrian Accessibility of Basic Urban Services by Residential Development Morphotypes in Krasnodar, Saratov, and Naberezhnye Chelny," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 150-162, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1134_s2079970524600677
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970524600677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970524600677
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970524600677?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1134_s2079970524600677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.