IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reaccs/v30y2025i1d10.1007_s11142-023-09819-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The spillover effect of SEC comment letters through audit firms

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth L. Bills

    (Michigan State University)

  • Ryan Cating

    (University of Central Arkansas)

  • Chenxi Lin

    (University of Oklahoma)

  • Timothy A. Seidel

    (BYU Marriott School of Business, Brigham Young University)

Abstract

This study examines whether auditors serve as a conduit for disseminating Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) views on reporting and disclosure matters as the result of being privy to clients’ SEC comment letters. This examination is important because auditors’ involvement in and private access to clients’ comment letters can enhance the timeliness of dissemination and constrain reporting or disclosure choices that diverge from SEC views. Among clients with a greater expectation of impaired goodwill that do not receive a comment letter with a goodwill-related comment, we find a greater likelihood of goodwill impairment when the audit firm serving the client is exposed to more goodwill-related comments received by other clients. Further examination of the channels of dissemination through the audit firm indicates that the results are driven by auditor exposure through other clients of the audit office in the same industry, the channel with the greatest exposure to the audit team, and clients in different audit offices in different industries, the channel with the broadest potential for spillover (i.e., the greatest number of other audit firm clients). Importantly, we observe these effects after controlling for alternative sources of spillover and when auditor comment letter exposure is not yet publicly available, suggesting that auditors’ private access to client comment letters facilitates timely spillover. Further analyses indicate that spillover through industry clients within the audit office is also apparent in goodwill footnote disclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth L. Bills & Ryan Cating & Chenxi Lin & Timothy A. Seidel, 2025. "The spillover effect of SEC comment letters through audit firms," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 311-351, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:30:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11142-023-09819-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11142-023-09819-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-023-09819-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11142-023-09819-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    SEC; Comment letter; Spillover effect; Audit quality; Auditor competency;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:30:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11142-023-09819-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.