IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v59y2025i1d10.1007_s11135-024-01930-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motivation mechanism: a study of behavioral competence diversity toward exploitative and exploratory innovation in open interdisciplinary teams

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng-Ta Lin

    (Far East University)

  • Yen-Hsun Chen

    (Far East University)

Abstract

This research is constituted by interview and quantitative research and it intends to explore the connections among behavioral competence diversity, motivation mechanism, exploitative innovation, and exploratory innovation. It puts great efforts on how to gain the capabilities on exploitative and exploratory innovation in interdisciplinary teams via motivation mechanism, which comprises reward, commitment, and self-efficacy. A total of 400 questionnaires were filled out to the people who participate Cross-field innovation value-added promotion plan in green technology and 159 vali responses. First, we found out that behavioral competence diversity has positive relationship with reward and commitment. Second, Commitment has significantly influence on self-efficacy. Third, self-efficacy positively affects exploitative innovation. However, there are no significant influence among reward, self-efficacy, and exploratory innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng-Ta Lin & Yen-Hsun Chen, 2025. "Motivation mechanism: a study of behavioral competence diversity toward exploitative and exploratory innovation in open interdisciplinary teams," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 457-476, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-024-01930-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-024-01930-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-024-01930-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-024-01930-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-024-01930-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.