IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v58y2024i5d10.1007_s11135-024-01843-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Showcasing the usefulness of web probing: Do subtle variations in questionnaire translation lead to different survey responding?

Author

Listed:
  • Dorothée Behr

    (GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)

  • Michael Braun

    (GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)

  • Luisa Aiglstorfer

    (GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
    Sirona Dental Systems GmbH)

Abstract

It is generally taken for granted that comparability in comparative research hinges, among others, on the quality of questionnaire translations. However, what do slight differences in translation mean for respondents’ answers? In this article, we look at a combination of quantitative evidence from split-ballot experiments and qualitative evidence from additional probing questions for three items that were translated according to different translation methods, resulting in different translations, e.g., for “our national way of life.” Two of the three items do not show any quantitative differences between translation versions when implemented in split-ballot experiments. However, using open-ended probing questions we delved deeper into the effects of different translation versions. This allowed us to show that different translations do indeed change respondent understanding. We suggest mechanisms that may lead to different translations (not) having an impact on the data, and we also try to align the results to the notion of equivalence/comparability in translation. Ultimately, we showcase the usefulness of web probing for exploring different translation understandings.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorothée Behr & Michael Braun & Luisa Aiglstorfer, 2024. "Showcasing the usefulness of web probing: Do subtle variations in questionnaire translation lead to different survey responding?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 4117-4135, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-024-01843-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-024-01843-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-024-01843-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-024-01843-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-024-01843-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.