IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v58y2024i3d10.1007_s11135-023-01747-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of research intensity on total factor productivity in OECD countries during 1890–2018: evidence from a new Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood estimation approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sakiru Adebola Solarin

    (Faculty of Business, Multimedia University)

  • Pritish Kumar Sahu

    (International Management Institute)

Abstract

In the literature of total factor productivity (TFP), the roles of several variables in explaining TFP remain largely unexplored, including the impact of research intensity. This paper examines the effect of research intensity on TFP in 15 OECD countries, while providing for financial development and education level during the period 1890–2018. We have used a new Poisson maximum likelihood estimation method, which requires minimal assumptions about the data distribution, to estimate the relationship in the variables. The results reveal that research intensity, financial development, education level and oil crisis have positive impact on TFP, while the two World Wars have negative impact on TFP. In the model featuring all the control variables and dummies, it is observed that for every one percentage point increase in research intensity, TFP grows by 0.086 point. The results further show that the positive impact of research intensity on TFP is more conspicuous in G7 countries relative to non-G7 nations. The sample has been divided into G7 and non-G7 countries and the equations are re-estimated. The empirical results are not materially different from results of the 15 OECD countries. For the sake of robustness, we have also used a new sequential linear panel data estimation approach to estimate the impact of research intensity on TFP, but similar results are obtained. The policy implications of the empirical results are detailed in the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Sakiru Adebola Solarin & Pritish Kumar Sahu, 2024. "The effect of research intensity on total factor productivity in OECD countries during 1890–2018: evidence from a new Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood estimation approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 2389-2412, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01747-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-023-01747-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-023-01747-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-023-01747-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research intensity; Total factor productivity; Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood; OECD countries;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O20 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - General
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01747-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.