Author
Abstract
Gender inequality is the deprivation of an individual or group of individuals a particular right or rights that are readily available to persons of the opposite sex in the same category. Gender inequality popularity cannot be overemphasized and it is increasing day by day. This popularity has attracted great researchers to delve more into this topic and today, we have a plethora of research studies on this topic. This research aims at performing a scientometric analysis of various pieces of research performed on selected sub-categories of gender inequalities within twenty (20) years (1999–2018). The choice of sub-categories was arrived at based on keyword reputation along with the number of publications in each sub-category as presented in the Scopus database. The results of the analysis were visualized with VOSviewer and Biblioshiny web interface. Publications and journal citation count analysis, influential institutes and countries, key research topics, and author collaboration are evaluated from Scopus bibliographic data. Health, education, adult, income, and poverty are the most prominent identified subcategories. Authors from the USA have the overall highest contributions and 73.57% of the total contributions made in the social sciences sub-category. The country also has the highest collaboration network with the rest of the world in gender inequality research work, followed by Australia and Canada. South Africa is the highest number of collaborating country in the African region. Female, male, human, adult and middle-aged are the most frequently used keywords in publications related to gender inequalities as identified by our analysis. Full descriptions of the output are given in the results and discussion section. This will help researchers, government and non-governmental organisations, decision-makers, and the general public have detailed insights into studies around gender imbalances and make well-informed decisions.
Suggested Citation
Sulaimon Oyeniyi Adebayo & Munish Saini, 2023.
"A scientometric study for scientific research publication on gender inequality,"
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 5107-5135, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-022-01604-5
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-022-01604-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-022-01604-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.