IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v57y2023i4d10.1007_s11135-021-01289-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PLS-SEM bias: traditional vs consistent

Author

Listed:
  • Oğuz Yıldız

    (Istanbul Gelisim University)

Abstract

Partial Least Squares (PLS) path modeling is suitable for predictive research and can also handle both reflective and formative measurement models. On the other hand, when the data derive from a common factor model population, PLS-SEM’s parameter estimates differ from the prespecified values. This trait is PLS-Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) bias, which is a controversial issue among many researchers. Bearing that in mind, the study's ultimate aim is to evaluate PLS-SEM bias at a relatively large sample size through regular and consistent PLS-SEM in the mobile shopping context. The subsidiary goal is to assess word-of-mouth concept, which is rarely used in the mobile context, within Technology Acceptance Model by employing PLS path modeling. Data were collected from 560 consumers via questionnaires and analyzed via SmartPLS 3. Findings show that regular PLS-SEM bias does not seem to diminish at a relatively large sample size when estimating data from common factor population. This study, also, offers to prefer PLSc in reflectively structured models in marketing, and also put forward that word-of-mouth is a substantial determinant in the acceptance of mobile shopping.

Suggested Citation

  • Oğuz Yıldız, 2023. "PLS-SEM bias: traditional vs consistent," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 537-552, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01289-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021-01289-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-021-01289-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-021-01289-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01289-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.