Author
Listed:
- Gala Avvisati
(Sezione Di Napoli Osservatorio Vesuviano)
- Giuliana D’Addezio
(Istituto Nazionale Di Geofisica E Vulcanologia (INGV))
- Elisa Fiorenza
(University of Sannio)
- Enrica Marotta
(Sezione Di Napoli Osservatorio Vesuviano)
- Rosella Nave
(Sezione Di Napoli Osservatorio Vesuviano)
- Schahrzad Hassan
(University of Sannio
University of Antsiranana)
- Raffaela Ciuffreda
(University of Sannio)
- Giovanni Trapani
(Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR))
- Roberto Jannelli
(University of Sannio)
Abstract
Research Institutions are tackling the ever so increasing challenge to share the outcomes of scientific research and technological innovations with a forthright method in order to increase involvement of the community. To achieve that aim, the main recipients of the information must be the focus point on which outreach and educational activities concentrate. Standard analysis of visitor’s experiences within informal learning activities can provide useful information on the activity impacts. In fact, evaluating the performance allows to improve the effects, achievements and benefits in the audiences. This research was carried out by analysing quantitative and qualitative studies performed in the occasion of a temporary outreach event, in which visitors were the focal point. Different types of audiences were examined during an Open Day at the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)—Italian Institute of Geophysical and Volcanological Research—based in Rome, leading to the results we present in this work. The event was remarkable as it brought together a broad selection of scientific laboratories, exhibition spaces and meetings with researchers, all custom tailored towards the specific audiences. At the end of the event, questionnaires were handed over to the visitors, both young and adults, and to any stakeholder that were present. The answers and the open feedbacks from the visitors have disclosed valuable information on INGV’s audience, and allowed the events organization and contents to be refined and improved. This procedure can most certainly be turned into a methodical system to obtain a general picture of the cognitive and emotional effects on visitors participating in scientific itineraries. The quantitative method used in this research involved analysing the answers in the questionnaires with a statistical approach and was blended with the qualitative method that took into account the visitor’s personal feedback and input. The aftermath of the study allows to pinpoint the main event issues and to take actions aimed to enrich visitor’s satisfaction and experience. In fact, advertising of the events ahead of time, arranging a well designed and implemented online information and booking system in order to better accommodate for the number of visitors, realizing dedicated apps for the each tours, creating a shorter questionnaire for children, and creating standards for questionnaires that would be used in the future.
Suggested Citation
Gala Avvisati & Giuliana D’Addezio & Elisa Fiorenza & Enrica Marotta & Rosella Nave & Schahrzad Hassan & Raffaela Ciuffreda & Giovanni Trapani & Roberto Jannelli, 2023.
"Outcomes from a visitors study at the “INGV Open Day Event”,"
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 433-448, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01122-w
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021-01122-w
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01122-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.