IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v53y2019i6d10.1007_s11135-019-00896-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Italians’ general satisfaction and perception of the country’s priority problems: A regional analysis of the phenomenon and its evolution from 2000 to 2015

Author

Listed:
  • Domenico Tucci

    (Italian National Institute of Statistics)

  • Lorella Sicuro

    (Italian National Institute of Statistics)

  • Domenico Di Spalatro

    (Italian National Institute of Statistics)

  • Fabrizio Maturo

    (Biostatistics Unit, CRF, National University of Ireland Galway)

Abstract

In the last few decades, many institutional initiatives have remarked that gross domestic product is unable to capture all aspects of well-being within society. At the same time, in some countries, such as Italy, this theme is still under study because recent research has pointed out this country is arguably the only Western nation where regional imbalances still play a meaningful role nowadays. The present research aims to examine the overall satisfaction of Italians, at a local level, and the perception they have about the country’s priority problems. The analysis tends to discern the evolution of the above aspects in four distinct stages, i.e. 2000–2005–2010–2015. Precisely, the objective is to understand if and how the sense of satisfaction and perception of some aspects of everyday life has evolved. Using the data collected by ISTAT within the multi-purpose project survey “Daily life aspects”, twenty-six subjective social indicators, which express the level of satisfaction of some aspects of one’s life and the judgment on problems of one’s context, are contemplated. The k-means cluster analysis is applied to identify homogeneous groups of regions based on the chosen indicators and the evolution of their composition and characteristics over time. Our findings show that there are significant and exciting regional characterisations. Notably, people living in southern Italy suffer most from unemployment and poverty whereas the regions with the most populated cities are dissatisfied with traffic and pollution. Policymakers must, therefore, consider these people’s priority problems to evaluate the impacts that the political actions may have at an economic, social and territorial level.

Suggested Citation

  • Domenico Tucci & Lorella Sicuro & Domenico Di Spalatro & Fabrizio Maturo, 2019. "Italians’ general satisfaction and perception of the country’s priority problems: A regional analysis of the phenomenon and its evolution from 2000 to 2015," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(6), pages 2821-2842, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:53:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-019-00896-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-019-00896-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-019-00896-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-019-00896-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesco Burchi & Chiara Gnesi, 2016. "A Review of the Literature on Well-Being in Italy: A Human Development Perspective," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2-3), pages 170-192, August.
    2. Emanuele Felice, 2017. "The Roots of a Dual Equilibrium: GDP, Productivity and Structural Change in the Italian Regions in the Long-run (1871-2011)," Quaderni di storia economica (Economic History Working Papers) 40, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    3. Fabrizio Maturo & Antonio Balzanella & Tonio Di Battista, 2019. "Building Statistical Indicators of Equitable and Sustainable Well-Being in a Functional Framework," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(3), pages 449-471, December.
    4. Kitty Stewart, 2005. "Dimensions Of Well-Being In Eu Regions: Do GDP And Unemployment Tell us All We Need To Know?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 221-246, September.
    5. André Vanoli, 2010. "On the Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (2009)," RatSWD Working Papers 162, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annamaria Porreca & Salvador Cruz Rambaud & Francesca Scozzari & Marta Nicola, 2019. "A fuzzy approach for analysing equitable and sustainable well-being in Italian regions," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(6), pages 935-942, July.
    2. Laura Bocci & Pierpaolo D’Urso & Vincenzina Vitale, 2021. "Clustering of the Italian Regions Based on Their Equitable and Sustainable Well-Being Indicators: A Three-Way Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 995-1043, June.
    3. Lijing Dong & Zhanhua Jia & Lingyu Zhang & Shaohua Wang, 2022. "Obstacle Factors and Spatial Measurement of the Well-Being of the Elderly in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Guido Bonatti & Enrico Ivaldi, 2016. "Un indicatore per la misurazione della partecipazione culturale e sociale nelle regioni italiane," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 283-302.
    5. Marco Grasso & Luciano Canova, 2008. "An Assessment of the Quality of Life in the European Union Based on the Social Indicators Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 1-25, May.
    6. Johannes Vatter, 2012. "Well-Being in Germany: GDP and Unemployment Still Matter," RatSWD Working Papers 196, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    7. Weam Tunsi & Hisham Alidrisi, 2023. "The Innovation-Based Human Development Index Using PROMETHEE II: The Context of G8 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Pierpaolo D’Urso & Vincenzina Vitale, 2021. "Modeling Local BES Indicators by Copula-Based Bayesian Networks," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 823-847, February.
    9. Giorgio Calcagnini & Francesco Perugini, 2019. "A Well-Being Indicator for the Italian Provinces," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 149-177, February.
    10. Silvia Facchinetti & Elena Siletti, 2022. "Well-being Indicators: a Review and Comparison in the Context of Italy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 523-547, January.
    11. Antonio Jurado & Jesus Perez-Mayo, 2012. "Construction and Evolution of a Multidimensional Well-Being Index for the Spanish Regions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 107(2), pages 259-279, June.
    12. Fabrizio Maturo & Rosanna Verde, 2023. "Supervised classification of curves via a combined use of functional data analysis and tree-based methods," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 419-459, March.
    13. Irina I. Semenova, Alyona Yu. Tian, 2024. "Assessment of the Impact of Health Capital on Earnings and Subjective Well-Being of the Employed Population in Russia," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 23(2), pages 279-303.
    14. Johannes Vatter, 2012. "Well-Being in Germany: What Explains the Regional Variation?," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 435, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    15. Francesco Bripi & Raffaello Bronzini & Elena Gentili & Andrea Linarello & Elisa Scarinzi, 2022. "Structural change and firm dynamics in the south of Italy," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 676, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    16. Calcagnini, Giorgio & Perugini, Francesco, 2019. "Social capital and well-being in the Italian provinces," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Daniel Toro González, 2013. "[Resena] Retos en la medición del desempeno económico y social," Revista Economía y Región, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, vol. 7(1), pages 244-247, June.
    18. Francesco Burchi & Nicole Rippin & Claudio E. Montenegro, 2018. "From income poverty to multidimensional poverty—an international comparison," One Pager Arabic 400, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    19. Mancini, Giulia, 2019. "The determinants of female labor supply in Italy, 1881-2018," MPRA Paper 102165, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Jared Abigail Valencia-Salvador & Fabio Humberto Sepúlveda-Murillo & Miguel Alfonso Flores-Sánchez & Norely Margarita Soto Builes, 2022. "Spatial Distribution of Social Inequality in the Metropolitan District of Quito, Ecuador," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 753-769, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:53:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-019-00896-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.