IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v48y2014i1p127-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Item comparability in cross-national surveys: results from asking probing questions in cross-national web surveys about attitudes towards civil disobedience

Author

Listed:
  • Dorothée Behr
  • Michael Braun
  • Lars Kaczmirek
  • Wolfgang Bandilla

Abstract

This article focuses on assessing item comparability in cross-national surveys by asking probing questions in Web surveys. The “civil disobedience” item from the “rights in a democracy” scale of the International Social Survey Program (ISSP) serves as a substantive case study. Identical Web surveys were fielded in Canada (English-speaking), Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Spain, and the U.S. A category-selection and a comprehension probe, respectively, were incorporated into the Web surveys after the closed-ended “civil disobedience” item. Responses to the category selection-probe reveal that notably in Germany, Hungary, and Spain the detachment of politicians from the people and their lack of responsiveness is deplored. Responses to the comprehension probe show that mainly in the U.S. and Canada violence and/or destruction are associated with civil disobedience. These results suggest reasons for the peculiar statistical results found for the “civil disobedience” item in the ISSP study. On the whole, Web probing proves to be a valuable tool for identifying interpretation differences and potential bias in cross-national survey research. Copyright The Author(s) 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Dorothée Behr & Michael Braun & Lars Kaczmirek & Wolfgang Bandilla, 2014. "Item comparability in cross-national surveys: results from asking probing questions in cross-national web surveys about attitudes towards civil disobedience," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 127-148, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:48:y:2014:i:1:p:127-148
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-012-9754-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-012-9754-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-012-9754-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacobsen, Jannes & Fuchs, Lukas Marian, 2020. "Can We Compare Conceptions of Democracy in Cross-Linguistic and Cross-National Research? : Evidence from a Random Sample of Refugees in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 151(2), pages 669-690.
    2. Ilona Wysmułek & Irina Tomescu-Dubrow & Joonghyun Kwak, 2022. "Ex-post harmonization of cross-national survey data: advances in methodological and substantive inquiries," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1701-1708, June.
    3. Michael Braun & Dorothée Behr & Juan Díez Medrano, 2018. "What do respondents mean when they report to be “citizens of the world”? Using probing questions to elucidate international differences in cosmopolitanism," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 1121-1135, May.
    4. Jannes Jacobsen & Lukas Marian Fuchs, 2020. "Can We Compare Conceptions of Democracy in Cross-Linguistic and Cross-National Research? Evidence from a Random Sample of Refugees in Germany," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 669-690, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:48:y:2014:i:1:p:127-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.