IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v45y2011i6p1175-1199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive interviewing and factor-analytic techniques: a mixed method approach to validity of survey items measuring national identity

Author

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Rossalina Latcheva, 2011. "Cognitive interviewing and factor-analytic techniques: a mixed method approach to validity of survey items measuring national identity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 1175-1199, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:45:y:2011:i:6:p:1175-1199
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-009-9285-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-009-9285-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-009-9285-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Foddy, 1996. "The in-depth testing of survey questions: A critical appraisal of methods," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 361-370, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tatiana Panyusheva & Maria Efremova, 2012. "A validation study of a Russian version of the Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) using cognitive interviewing," HSE Working papers WP BRP 04/PSY/2012, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    2. André Krouwel & Annemarie Elfrinkhof, 2014. "Combining strengths of methods of party positioning to counter their weaknesses: the development of a new methodology to calibrate parties on issues and ideological dimensions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1455-1472, May.
    3. Madan Angela, 2024. "Country Brand as an Important Phenomenon of Modern Society," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 367-377.
    4. Shang Ha & Seung-Jin Jang, 2015. "National Identity, National Pride, and Happiness: The Case of South Korea," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 471-482, April.
    5. Jayachandran, Seema & Biradavolu, Monica & Cooper, Jan, 2021. "Using Machine Learning and Qualitative Interviews to Design a Five-Question Women's Agency Index," IZA Discussion Papers 14221, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Marlene Mußotter, 2022. "We do not measure what we aim to measure: Testing Three Measurement Models for Nationalism and Patriotism," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2177-2197, August.
    7. Jayachandran, Seema & Biradavolu, Monica & Cooper, Jan, 2023. "Using machine learning and qualitative interviews to design a five-question survey module for women’s agency," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Michael Braun & Dorothée Behr & Juan Díez Medrano, 2018. "What do respondents mean when they report to be “citizens of the world”? Using probing questions to elucidate international differences in cosmopolitanism," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 1121-1135, May.
    9. Bastiaan Bruinsma & Marlene Mußotter, 2023. "A Move Forward: Exploring National Identity Through Non-linear Principal Component Analysis in Germany," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 885-903, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Kaplowitz, 2000. "Statistical Analysis of Sensitive Topics in Group and Individual Interviews," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 419-431, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:45:y:2011:i:6:p:1175-1199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.