IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v30y1996i4p389-404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multilevel analysis of the changing relationship between class and party in Britain 1964–1992

Author

Listed:
  • A. Heath
  • M. Yang
  • H. Goldstein

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Heath & M. Yang & H. Goldstein, 1996. "Multilevel analysis of the changing relationship between class and party in Britain 1964–1992," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 389-404, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:30:y:1996:i:4:p:389-404
    DOI: 10.1007/BF00170144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF00170144
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF00170144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miller, W. L., 1978. "Social Class and Party Choice in England: A New Analysis," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 257-284, July.
    2. Heath, Anthony & Evans, Geoffrey, 1994. "Tactical Voting: Concepts, Measurement and Findings," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(4), pages 557-561, October.
    3. Przeworski, Adam & Soares, Glaucio A. D., 1971. "Theories in Search of a Curve: A Contextual Interpretation of Left Vote," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 65(1), pages 51-68, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew McCulloch, 2001. "Ward-Level Deprivation and Individual Social and Economic Outcomes in the British Household Panel Study," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(4), pages 667-684, April.
    2. Susanna Zaccarin & Giulia Rivellini, 2002. "Multilevel analysis in social research: An application of a cross-classified model," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 11(1), pages 95-108, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carina Bischoff, 2013. "Electorally unstable by supply or demand?—an examination of the causes of electoral volatility in advanced industrial democracies," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 537-561, September.
    2. Charles J Pattie & Ron J Johnston, 2002. "Political Talk and Voting: Does it Matter to Whom One Talks?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(6), pages 1113-1135, June.
    3. Ron Johnston & Kelvyn Jones & Min-Hua Jen, 2009. "Regional Variations in Voting at British General Elections, 1950–2001: Group-Based Latent Trajectory Analysis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(3), pages 598-616, March.
    4. E A Fieldhouse & R Tye, 1996. "Deprived People or Deprived Places? Exploring the Ecological Fallacy in Studies of Deprivation with the Samples of Anonymised Records," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(2), pages 237-259, February.
    5. Tandon, Sharad, 2012. "Election Outcomes and Food Security: Evidence from Consumption of Scheduled Castes and Tribes in India," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124414, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Ianni, Antonella & Corradi, Valentina, 2000. "Consensus, contagion and clustering in a space-time model of public opinion formation," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 0009, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
    7. David P. Myatt, 2000. "Strategic Voting Under the Qualified Majority Rule," Economics Series Working Papers 2000-W07, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    8. Ron Johnston & Danny Dorling & Helena Tunstall & David Rossiter & Iain MacAllister & Charles Pattie, 2000. "Locating the Altruistic Voter: Context, Egocentric Voting, and Support for the Conservative Party at the 1997 General Election in England and Wales," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(4), pages 673-694, April.
    9. Sobbrio, Francesco & Navarra, Pietro, 2010. "Electoral participation and communicative voting in Europe," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 185-207, June.
    10. HeeMin Kim & Hyeyoung Yoo & Jungho Roh, 2015. "A re-examination of the effects of the economy, government spending, and incumbent ideology on national policy mood," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 329-344, December.
    11. Floris Vermeulen & Maria Kranendonk & Laure Michon, 2020. "Immigrant concentration at the neighbourhood level and bloc voting: The case of Amsterdam," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(4), pages 766-788, March.
    12. David Cutts & Edward Fieldhouse, 2009. "What Small Spatial Scales Are Relevant as Electoral Contexts for Individual Voters? The Importance of the Household on Turnout at the 2001 General Election," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(3), pages 726-739, July.
    13. Tom Baumgartner & Tom Burns & L. Meeker, 1977. "The description and analysis of system stability and change: Multi-level concepts and methodology," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 287-328, December.
    14. David Goetze, 1994. "Comparing Prisoner's Dilemma, Commons Dilemma, and Public Goods Provision Designs in Laboratory Experiments," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 38(1), pages 56-86, March.
    15. R J Johnston, 1986. "Research Policy and Review 9. A Space for Place (or a Place for Space) in British Psephology: A Review of Recent Writings with Especial Reference to the General Election of 1983," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 18(5), pages 573-598, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:30:y:1996:i:4:p:389-404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.